Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A method for relating loudness-matching and intensity-discrimination data.

R S Schlauch, C C Wier

    Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
    |March 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Duration discrimination and subjective duration for ramped and damped sounds.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
    Same author

    Safety and clinical performance of acoustic reflex tests.

    Ear and hearing·1999
    Same author

    The peaked audiometric configuration in Meniere's disease: disease related?

    Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·1999
    Same author

    Perception of changes in loudness.

    Nature·1999
    Same author

    Masker laterality and cueing in forward-masked intensity discrimination.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
    Same author

    Basilar membrane nonlinearity and loudness.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1998
    Same journal

    Temporal resolution in infancy and subsequent language development.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Evidence of sensitivity to structural contrasts in the literature on children's language comprehension.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Narrative development in late talkers: early school age.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    A system for the diagnosis of specific language impairment in kindergarten children.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Interactive focused stimulation for toddlers with expressive vocabulary delays.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Auditory lexical decisions of children with specific language impairment.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    See all related articles

    A new method compares loudness perception and intensity discrimination in hearing-impaired and normal listeners. Results show loudness grows faster than intensity discrimination at lower sensation levels in impaired ears.

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Psychoacoustics
    • Hearing Science

    Background:

    • Loudness perception and intensity discrimination are key aspects of auditory function.
    • Direct comparisons between these measures are challenging due to differing methodologies.
    • Understanding their relationship is crucial for assessing hearing impairment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To introduce a novel method for directly comparing pure-tone loudness-matching and intensity-discrimination data.
    • To investigate the relationship between loudness perception and intensity discrimination in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    • To compare traditional loudness recruitment functions with derived "intensity-recruitment" functions.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a method minimizing assumptions about loudness perception and intensity discrimination.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Inferred standard levels for difference limens in impaired ears from normal-ear data.
  • Collected loudness-matching and intensity-discrimination data from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

    • Main Results:

    • The method produced functions comparable to traditional loudness recruitment functions.
    • Derived "intensity-recruitment" functions showed similarities to loudness recruitment functions.
    • A key difference emerged at low/moderate sensation levels, where loudness grew faster than difference limens.

    Conclusions:

    • The study presents a valid method for comparing loudness and intensity discrimination.
    • Findings suggest loudness growth and intensity discrimination are not always tightly coupled, especially at lower sensation levels.
    • This has implications for understanding auditory processing in hearing loss.