Electrochemical treatment for leachate membrane retentate: Performance comparison of electrochemical oxidation and...

With the widespread use of membrane in advanced treatment of leachate, China produces a large amount of leachate membrane retentate (LMR) (≈23.4 million tons) annually, which is usually treated by incineration or recirculation in engineering, but these technologies have many drawbacks. LMR is suitable for electrochemical treatment due to its high electrical conductivity. This study compared the performances of electrochemical oxidation (EO) and electro-coagulation (EC) technology on LMR treatment under different experimental conditions, including anode material, current density, initial pH and reaction time. We found that EO optimal conditions achieved 70.1%, 83.1%, 78.7%, 98.7%, and 69.7% removal of total organic carbon (TOC), UV absorption (at 254 nm), chromaticity, ammonia nitrogen (NH₃-N), and total nitrogen (TN), respectively. Compared with EO, EC exhibited a similar removal ability for orgainics and better removals of chroma, but much less performance for removing nitrogen pollutants in the same reaction time, that is, removals of NH₃-N and TN were only 31.5% and 36.2%, respectively. Meanwhile, EC showed much higher instantaneous current efficiency of COD than EO under its optimal reaction time (120 min). In addition, the UV-Vis spectra and 3D fluorescence spectra indicated that EO exhibited relatively outstanding performance in decomposing dissolved organic matter (DOM) with rather complicated structures than EC. Also, the flow field-flow fractionation technique demonstrated that EO preferentially destroy humic-like, large molecular weight DOM, and converting them to smaller molecules, which resulted in more volatile organic compounds in EO samples than EC samples. While EC had little selectivity in the removal of organics, except humic-like DOM with relative small molecular. These findings can provide a theoretical basis for the electrochemical treatment of LMR.