Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2025
Multi-level analysis of intrinsically disordered protein docking methods
Jacob Verburgt1, Zicong Zhang2, Daisuke Kihara3
1Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs) are a class of proteins in which at least some region of the protein does not possess any stable structure in solution in the physiological condition but may adopt an ordered structure upon binding to a globular receptor. These IDP-receptor complexes are thus subject to protein complex modeling in which computational techniques are applied to accurately reproduce the IDP ligand-receptor interactions. This often exists in the form of protein docking, in which the 3D structures of both the subunits are known, but the position of the ligand relative to the receptor is not. Here, we evaluate the performance of three IDP-receptor modeling tools with metrics that characterize the IDP-receptor interface at various resolutions. We show that all three methods are able to properly identify the general binding site, as identified by lower resolution metrics, but begin to struggle with higher resolution metrics that capture biophysical interactions.
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs) are a class of proteins in which at least some region of the protein does not possess any stable structure in solution in the physiological condition but may adopt an ordered structure upon binding to a globular receptor. These IDP-receptor complexes are thus subject to protein complex modeling in which computational techniques are applied to accurately reproduce the IDP ligand-receptor interactions. This often exists in the form of protein docking, in which the 3D structures of both the subunits are known, but the position of the ligand relative to the receptor is not. Here, we evaluate the performance of three IDP-receptor modeling tools with metrics that characterize the IDP-receptor interface at various resolutions. We show that all three methods are able to properly identify the general binding site, as identified by lower resolution metrics, but begin to struggle with higher resolution metrics that capture biophysical interactions.
More Related Videos
05:08Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
Published on: July 8, 2025
10:33Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors
Published on: October 26, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Protein-protein Interfaces
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Protein-Drug Binding: Determination Methods
Indirect methods involve isolating the bound drug from its free form in biological samples such as blood, serum, or plasma. These techniques aim to measure the percentage of drugs bound to proteins. Equilibrium dialysis is a commonly used method where the free drug concentration at equilibrium is measured by separating the bound...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...