Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

44.3K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
44.3K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

7.5K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
7.5K
Overview of Transposition and Recombination02:13

Overview of Transposition and Recombination

16.1K
Transposons make up a significant part of genomes of various organisms. Therefore, it is believed that transposition played a major evolutionary role in speciation by changing genome sizes and modifying gene expression patterns. For example, in bacteria, transposition can lead to conferring antibiotic resistance. Movement of transposable elements within the genetic pool of pathogenic bacteria can aid in transfer of antibiotic-resistant genetic elements. In eukaryotes, transposons can carry out...
16.1K
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

21.5K
Overview
21.5K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

2.7K
2.7K
Non-LTR Retrotransposons03:18

Non-LTR Retrotransposons

11.9K
As the name suggests, non-LTR retrotransposons lack the long terminal repeats characteristic of the LTR retrotransposons. Additionally, both LTR and non-LTR retrotransposons use distinct mechanisms of mobilization. Non-LTR retrotransposons are further divided into two classes - Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) and short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs), both of which occur abundantly in most mammals, including humans. Some of the active non-LTR retrotransposons in humans are L1...
11.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evolutionary rate correlations reveal long-term co-evolutionary interactions in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Admixture in the fungal pathogen Blastomyces.

Genetics·2024
Same author

The fitness of an introgressing haplotype changes over the course of divergence and depends on its size and genomic location.

PLoS biology·2023
Same author

Patterns of Population Structure and Introgression Among Recently Differentiated Drosophila melanogaster Populations.

Molecular biology and evolution·2022
Same author

The evolution of hybrid fitness during speciation.

PLoS genetics·2019
Same author

Systematic analysis of complex genetic interactions.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2018
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.1K

What inversion lengths can tell us about their evolution.

Andrius J Dagilis1

  • 1Biology Department, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Molecular Ecology
|May 25, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Genome inversions are common, but distinguishing adaptive from nonadaptive evolution is challenging. A new model predicts larger inversions arise from local adaptation, while smaller ones result from direct benefits or underdominance.

Keywords:
inversionspopulation geneticsstructural variation

More Related Videos

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

3.5K
Three and Four-Dimensional Visualization and Analysis Approaches to Study Vertebrate Axial Elongation and Segmentation
12:59

Three and Four-Dimensional Visualization and Analysis Approaches to Study Vertebrate Axial Elongation and Segmentation

Published on: February 28, 2021

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.1K
Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

3.5K
Three and Four-Dimensional Visualization and Analysis Approaches to Study Vertebrate Axial Elongation and Segmentation
12:59

Three and Four-Dimensional Visualization and Analysis Approaches to Study Vertebrate Axial Elongation and Segmentation

Published on: February 28, 2021

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary genetics
  • Population genetics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Genome structural variations, including inversions, are prevalent across species and populations.
  • Theoretical models support both adaptive and nonadaptive evolutionary pathways for inversions.
  • Distinguishing between these evolutionary scenarios remains a significant challenge in the field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To model how adaptive and nonadaptive scenarios influence the distribution of inversion sizes.
  • To predict how local adaptation, underdominance, and direct benefits affect inversion evolution.
  • To investigate the impact of deleterious mutations on the fixation probability of different inversion types.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a theoretical model to analyze inversion size distributions.
  • Examination of predictions regarding inversion size under various evolutionary pressures.
  • Analysis of the role of deleterious mutations in inversion fixation dynamics.

Main Results:

  • Larger inversions are predicted to evolve under local adaptation scenarios.
  • Smaller inversions are expected to evolve when they are underdominant or directly beneficial.
  • The presence of deleterious mutations can influence the probability of fixing inversions.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a framework for differentiating adaptive and nonadaptive inversion evolution based on size distribution.
  • Findings offer insights into the complex interplay of selection, mutation, and genetic drift in shaping genome structure.
  • This work synthesizes decades of inversion theory and advances our understanding of evolutionary processes.