Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Biaxial Mechanical Characterizations of Atrioventricular Heart Valves
Published on: April 9, 2019
Multichamber Strain Characterization Is a Robust Prognosticator for Both Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis
Zi Ye1, Li-Tan Yang2, Jose R Medina-Inojosa3
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Insights
Multichamber strain (MCS) characterization offers significant prognostic value for patients with aortic stenosis (AS), independent of cardiac damage (CD) staging. This sensitive measurement of subclinical cardiac damage improves risk classification in both bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve AS (TAV-AS).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Cardiac Mechanics
Background:
- Cardiac damage (CD) staging predicts survival in aortic stenosis (AS).
- Patients with bicuspid aortic valve AS (BAV-AS) show less CD than tricuspid aortic valve AS (TAV-AS).
- Subclinical CD assessment is crucial for prognosis in AS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic significance of multichamber strain (MCS) characterization.
- To compare the prognostic value of MCS in BAV-AS versus TAV-AS.
- To determine if MCS provides incremental value over CD staging.
Main Methods:
- Two-dimensional echocardiographic strain analysis in 209 BAV-AS and 369 TAV-AS patients.
- Characterization of cardiac mechanics by the number of impaired strain chambers (LV, LA, RV).
- Correlation of MCS with CD staging and assessment of all-cause death as primary outcome.
Main Results:
- MCS correlated modestly with CD staging in both BAV-AS (r=0.36) and TAV-AS (r=0.43).
- MCS was strongly associated with all-cause death, independent of CD staging (P<.001).
- MCS provided incremental prognostic value and improved risk classification in TAV-AS.
Conclusions:
- Multichamber strain (MCS) characterization is a robust prognosticator in moderate-to-severe AS.
- MCS offers incremental prognostic value beyond CD staging in both BAV-AS and TAV-AS.
- MCS can serve as an alternative or additive tool to CD staging for risk assessment.
Background:
Cardiac damage (CD) staging is associated with worse survival in aortic stenosis (AS). However, patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are less likely to develop CD than those with tricuspid aortic valve AS (TAV-AS). The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of multichamber strain (MCS) characterization, a sensitive measurement of subclinical CD, in patients with BAV- and TAV-AS.
Methods:
Offline two-dimensional echocardiographic strain analysis was performed in 209 consecutive patients with BAV and 369 patients with TAV with more than moderate AS (mean gradient, 47 ± 12 vs 47 ± 14 mm Hg, respectively; >90% severe AS), retrospectively identified from the echocardiography database. The extent of abnormal cardiac mechanics was characterized by the number of chambers with impaired longitudinal strain (left ventricle, left atrium, and right ventricle) as preserved or single-chamber, paired-chamber, or triple-chamber impaired strain. Cutoffs of strain parameters to define impaired versus preserved chamber function were 15% for the left ventricle, 24% for the left atrium, and 25% for the right ventricular free wall. CD was staged using a panel of comprehensive echocardiographic parameters. The primary outcome was all-cause death.
Results:
MCS (per chamber increase) modestly correlated with CD staging (per stage increase) in both groups (BAV, r = 0.36; TAV, r = 0.43). After a median follow-up period of 4.9 years (interquartile range, 2.2-4.6 years), 262 patients died (5-year survival 86.8 ± 2.4% [BAV-AS] vs 49.6 ± 2.7% [TAV-AS], P < .001). In multivariable analysis, MCS was strongly associated with all-cause death in BAV-AS and TAV-AS, separately, and independent of CD staging (P < .001 for both). MCS provided incremental prognostic value to CD staging in both BAV-AS and TAV-AS (P for χ2 change < .001 for both) and improved risk classification of CD staging in TAV AS (continuous net reclassification index = 0.24, P = .02).
Conclusion:
MCS characterization is a robust prognosticator in patients with greater than moderate AS and provides incremental prognostic value to CD staging in both BAV-AS and TAV-AS. Therefore, MCS characterization could represent an alternative or additive method to CD staging.
More Related Videos
13:07Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
07:34Layer Microdissection of Tricuspid Valve Leaflets for Biaxial Mechanical Characterization and Microstructural Quantification
Published on: February 10, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests