Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Employing the Forced Oscillation Technique for the Assessment of Respiratory Mechanics in Adults
Published on: February 9, 2022
Cut-off value for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction based on the features of the airway obstruction
Noeul Kang1, Eunsil Koh1, Jin-Young Lee2
1Division of Allergy, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
The current cut-off value for diagnosing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in adults-percent fall in FEV1 (ΔFEV1) ≥ 10% after exercise challenge test (ECT)-has low specificity and weak evidences. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the cut-off value for EIB that provides the highest diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Participants who underwent the ECT between 2007 and 2018 were categorized according to ΔFEV1: definite EIB (ΔFEV1 ≥ 15%), borderline (10% ≤ ΔFEV1 < 15%), and normal (ΔFEV1 < 10%). Distinct characteristics of the definite EIB group were identified and explored in the borderline EIB group. A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the optimal cut-off value. Of 128 patients, 60 were grouped as the definite EIB group, 23 as the borderline group, and 45 as the normal group. All participants were men, with a median age of 20 years (interquartile range [IQR:] 19-23 years). The definite EIB group exhibited wheezing on auscultation (P < 0.001), ΔFEV1/FVC ≥ 10% (P < 0.001), and ΔFEF25-75% ≥ 25% (P < 0.001) compared to other groups. Eight (8/23, 34.8%) patients in the borderline group had at least one of these features, but the trend was more similar to that of the normal group than the definite EIB group. A cut-off value of ΔFEV1 ≥ 13.5% had a sensitivity of 98.5% and specificity of 93.5% for EIB. Wheezing on auscultation, ΔFEV1/FVC ≥ 10%, and ΔFEF25-75% ≥ 25% after ECT may be useful for the diagnosis of EIB, particularly in individuals with a ΔFEV1 of 10-15%. For EIB, a higher cut-off value, possibly ΔFEV1 ≥ 13.5%, should be considered as the diagnostic criterion.
More Related Videos
09:58A Reversible, Non-invasive Method for Airway Resistance Measurements and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Sampling in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2010
08:44Author Spotlight: Integrating Alveolar-Capillary Reserve Measurements in Exercise Adaptation and Therapeutic Strategies
Published on: February 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-I: Introduction
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Asthma-I: Introduction
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Smoking is a primary risk factor for COPD, with over 80% of patients having a history of it. Patients typically experience progressive dyspnea or labored breathing, frequent coughing, and recurrent pulmonary infections. Many eventually succumb to respiratory failure, characterized by...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-II: Pathophysiology
Chronic Inflammation
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...