Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

3.7K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
3.7K
Steps in the Modeling Process01:14

Steps in the Modeling Process

335
Albert Bandura's theory of observational learning identifies four critical processes: attention, retention, motor reproduction, and reinforcement or motivation.
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
335
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

325
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
325

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing the effects of analogical instruction with internal and external focus of attention on golf putting skill learning in children with developmental coordination disorder: Emphasizing mental representation structure.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Individual vs. Group Setting Play-Based Movement in Physical Education: Differential Effects on Social and Cognitive Development in Primary School Children.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same author

Perceived Mental and Physical Fatigue, Stress and Recovery, and Workload in Masters Athletes Pre- and Post-Sailing Competition.

European journal of sport science·2025
Same author

The effect of ergometer cycling and visual foraging on brain function: A pilot study.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Correction: Artificial intelligence-enhanced assessment of fundamental motor skills: validity and reliability of the FUS test for jumping rope performance.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2025
Same author

Effects of Electronic Sports on the Cognitive Skills of Attention, Working Memory, and Cognitive Flexibility.

Perceptual and motor skills·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

21.3K

An Examination of the Contextual Interference Effect and the Errorless Learning Model during Motor Learning.

Hesam Ramezanzade1, Esmaeel Saemi2, David P Broadbent3

  • 1Department of Sport Science, School of Humanities, Damghan University, Damghan, Iran.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|May 26, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Motor learning is enhanced by errorless practice, especially when combined with random practice schedules. This approach improves skill automation and retention compared to errorful or blocked practice methods.

Keywords:
challenge point frameworkcognitive efforterror processingimplicit learningskill acquisition

More Related Videos

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

546.8K
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

21.3K
Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

546.8K
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Motor Learning
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Sports Science

Background:

  • Motor learning research explores how practice schedules and feedback influence skill acquisition.
  • Understanding the contextual interference (CI) effect is crucial for optimizing training protocols.
  • Error-based learning theories suggest that errors can be detrimental or beneficial depending on the learning context.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the combined effects of random versus block practice schedules with errorless versus errorful feedback on motor learning.
  • To examine the impact of these conditions on skill retention and transfer.
  • To determine how practice structure influences the automation of motor skills.

Main Methods:

  • 120 male participants were randomly assigned to one of eight experimental groups.
  • A dart throwing task was used to assess motor learning across different practice conditions.
  • Retention and transfer tests were conducted to evaluate learning and generalization.

Main Results:

  • The contextual interference (CI) effect was observed in errorless conditions but not in errorful conditions during retention tests.
  • Motor skill automation levels were influenced by the interaction between error feedback and practice structure.
  • Participants in the Random-Errorless group demonstrated superior performance in transfer tests, indicating higher automation.

Conclusions:

  • Errorless practice, particularly within a random practice schedule, promotes greater motor skill automation and transfer.
  • The effectiveness of errorful versus errorless conditions in motor learning is contingent upon the practice structure.
  • Optimizing motor learning requires careful consideration of both practice variability and feedback type.