Quantifying The Medical Impact of A Missed Diagnosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer on Chest Imaging

If a chest lesion is noted to have been visible on imaging conducted prior to a definitive diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer, medico-legal action directed against those considered to have missed the initial diagnosis may ensue. Evidence-based approaches to determine the medical impact of the resulting delay are limited. This article reviews strategies for quantifying the medical impact of missed diagnoses and identifies areas for future research. If no nodal or metastatic disease is present at the time of the definitive diagnosis, the potential impact of the delay is sometimes deduced from the differing 5-year overall survival rates of the T status-associated cancer stage at each time point. However, relapse-free survival, specific lung cancer subtype, time from diagnosis and the medical condition of the patient when the evaluation is being made may also have to be considered. In the absence of T-status change, medical impact from any delay is unlikely to be significant, although the effect of changes in patient fitness on outcomes, emotional distress and lost time for the patient's preparation may be argued. When nodal or metastatic involvement is noted at the time of definitive diagnosis, arguments may be made that these did not exist at the time of the missed diagnosis. However, more nuanced calculations considering differences in the risk of spread based on T-stage at each time point would be preferable. Large datasets to inform T to N-status correlations for such calculations already exist, but data to inform T to M-status correlations are limited.