Risk scores for predicting small for gestational age infants in Japan: The TMM birthree cohort study

Noriyuki Iwama1,2, Taku Obara3,4,5, Mami Ishikuro3,4

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1, Seiryomachi, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan. noriyuki.iwama@med.tohoku.ac.jp.

Scientific Reports
|May 26, 2022
PubMed

Insights

This study developed a pregnancy risk score to predict small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants in Japan. Mid-gestation risk scores showed acceptable predictive ability for SGA, outperforming early-gestation scores.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Perinatal Medicine
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants face increased risks.
  • Accurate prediction models are crucial for timely interventions.
  • Existing prediction tools may lack precision in specific populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a risk score for predicting SGA infants in Japan.
  • To compare the predictive performance of early versus mid-gestation risk scores.
  • To identify key predictive factors for SGA during pregnancy.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective cohort study of 17,073 subjects (Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study).
  • Multiple logistic regression was used to construct risk scores at early (11-17 weeks) and mid-gestation (18-21 weeks).
  • Risk scores included maternal demographics, lifestyle factors, medical history, and fetal measurements.

Main Results:

  • The mid-gestation risk score achieved a C-statistic of 0.725 (95% CI: 0.710-0.740).
  • The early-gestation risk score achieved a C-statistic of 0.658 (95% CI: 0.642-0.675).
  • Mid-gestation scores demonstrated superior predictive ability for SGA compared to early-gestation scores.

Conclusions:

  • Risk scores developed during mid-gestation provide acceptable prediction for SGA infants.
  • Predictive performance is significantly better in mid-gestation than in early gestation.
  • These findings can aid in early identification and management of SGA pregnancies.

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.5K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
11.4K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
376
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
713
Teratogenicity01:07

Teratogenicity

The ability of a drug to produce structural deformations and functional abnormalities in the developing embryo or the fetus is called teratogenicity, and the drug producing this effect is known as a teratogen. Teratogenic effects include stillbirth, miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, and neurocognitive delay. A teratogen may affect the embryo at different stages of development, which is important in determining the type and extent of the damage. During blastocyst formation, the early...
2.8K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
185