Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.0K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.0K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.9K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.1K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

906
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
906
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

83.3K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
83.3K
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

747
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
747

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adaptive AI for Cardiovascular Event Adjudication: Cardiovascular Event Adjudication Across Different Definitions in the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES and EUCLID Trials.

Circulation·2026
Same author

HorusEye: a self-supervised foundation model for generalizable X-ray tomography restoration.

Nature computational science·2026
Same author

Lifetime Adverse Pregnancy Outcome History and Cardiovascular Risk.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)·2026
Same author

Gradient Importance Learning for Incomplete Observations.

... International Conference on Learning Representations·2026
Same author

Learning Survival Distributions with the Asymmetric Laplace Distribution.

Proceedings of machine learning research·2025
Same author

Machine Learning Risk Prediction for Treated Retinopathy of Prematurity in Infants.

Neonatology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

652

Wasserstein Uncertainty Estimation for Adversarial Domain Matching.

Rui Wang1, Ruiyi Zhang2, Ricardo Henao1

  • 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

Frontiers in Big Data
|May 27, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel domain adaptation method using domain prediction uncertainty to reweight training samples. This approach improves model generalization across different domains without fine-tuning.

Keywords:
Wassersteindomain adaptationimage classificationoptimal transportuncertain

More Related Videos

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application
05:56

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application

Published on: April 14, 2023

2.7K
Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations
07:45

Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations

Published on: September 28, 2018

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

652
Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application
05:56

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application

Published on: April 14, 2023

2.7K
Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations
07:45

Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations

Published on: September 28, 2018

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Computer Vision

Background:

  • Domain adaptation seeks to generalize models from a labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain.
  • Domain shift presents a significant challenge, hindering model performance on unseen data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel domain adaptation technique by quantifying cross-domain transferability using domain prediction uncertainty.
  • To develop a sample reweighting mechanism based on this uncertainty to mitigate domain shift.
  • To enhance model generalization without requiring target domain fine-tuning.

Main Methods:

  • Quantifying cross-domain transferability via domain prediction uncertainty using Wasserstein gradient flows.
  • Implementing a sample reweighting strategy to adaptively exclude domain-specific samples during training.
  • Evaluating the approach on benchmark datasets for both balanced and partial domain adaptation scenarios.

Main Results:

  • The proposed reweighting mechanism effectively reduces domain shift.
  • The method provides a meaningful curriculum for cross-domain transfer.
  • Experimental results show improved performance in both balanced and partial domain adaptation settings.

Conclusions:

  • Domain prediction uncertainty, quantified by Wasserstein gradient flows, is a viable metric for assessing cross-domain transferability.
  • Adaptive sample reweighting based on this uncertainty is an effective strategy for domain adaptation.
  • The proposed method enhances model generalization and achieves state-of-the-art results on benchmark datasets.