Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

07:32
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
1.3K
Structural Conformation Comparison of Different Clear Aligner Systems: An In Vitro Study
Aseel Alhendi1, Rita Khounganian2, Raisuddin Ali3
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Dentistry Journal
|May 27, 2022
Summary
This study compared four clear aligner systems (Eon, SureSmile, Clarity, Invisalign) using hardness tests and spectroscopy. All systems showed similar polyurethane composition and hardness, with Invisalign having a smoother surface.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Orthodontics
- Materials Engineering
Background:
- Clear aligners are increasingly popular orthodontic devices.
- Understanding the material properties of different clear aligner systems is crucial for clinical success.
- Comparative studies are needed to evaluate the structural and compositional differences among leading clear aligner brands.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the structural conformations, material properties, and surface characteristics of Eon, SureSmile, Clarity, and Invisalign clear aligner systems.
- To assess the impact of artificial saliva exposure on these properties.
- To provide insights into material choices for orthodontic treatment.
Main Methods:
- Four clear aligner systems (Invisalign, Eon, SureSmile, Clarity) were tested.
- Specimens were exposed to artificial saliva for two weeks.
- Vickers hardness testing was performed.
- Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with Energy-Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were utilized for material analysis.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in hardness were found among the four systems.
- FTIR analysis confirmed all systems are polyurethane-based, with minor molecular composition variations.
- SEM revealed Invisalign had a smoother surface compared to Eon, SureSmile, and Clarity.
- Statistically significant differences in carbon weight percentages were observed.
Conclusions:
- All evaluated clear aligner systems exhibit comparable hardness and a polyurethane-based material composition.
- Minor structural and surface differences exist, with Invisalign showing a smoother surface.
- These findings suggest a range of suitable options for orthodontic treatment based on patient needs.
Keywords:
Clear Aligner AppliancesEDX-microanalysisFourier transform infrared spectroscopyVickers hardnessscanning electron microscopy
