Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Ultrasound Cyclo Plasty in Eyes with Glaucoma
Published on: January 26, 2018
Intraocular Pressure Measurement in Childhood Glaucoma under Standardized General Anaesthesia: The Prospective EyeBIS
Alicja Strzalkowska1, Nina Pirlich2, Julia V Stingl1
1Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg, University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Insights
The iCare PRO rebound tonometer consistently measures higher intraocular pressure (IOP) than the Perkins applanation tonometer in both childhood glaucoma patients and healthy children. This difference was observed regardless of anesthesia depth or duration, highlighting a key consideration for IOP assessment in pediatric eye care.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Pediatric Ophthalmology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Accurate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is crucial for diagnosing and managing childhood glaucoma.
- Different tonometry devices may yield varying IOP readings, particularly in pediatric populations.
- The influence of anesthesia depth and duration on IOP measurements in children requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare IOP measurements between iCare PRO rebound tonometry and Perkins applanation tonometry in children.
- To evaluate the impact of anesthesia depth, age, and corneal thickness on IOP readings from both devices.
- To assess the agreement between iCare and Perkins tonometry in pediatric glaucoma subjects and healthy controls.
Main Methods:
- Prospective clinical, case-control study involving 53 children with glaucoma and 22 healthy children undergoing general anesthesia.
- IOP measurements were taken three times (T1-T3) using both iCare PRO and Perkins tonometry, with alternating measurement order.
- Bland-Altman analysis was employed to assess the agreement between the two tonometry devices.
Main Results:
- Both iCare and Perkins tonometry showed statistically significantly higher IOP in glaucoma subjects compared to healthy controls.
- The iCare PRO consistently yielded higher median IOP readings than the Perkins tonometer in both groups (p < 0.001).
- The mean IOP difference between iCare and Perkins ranged from 4.9 to 7.3 mmHg, indicating a systematic overestimation by iCare.
Conclusions:
- The iCare PRO rebound tonometer demonstrates a systematic overestimation of IOP compared to the Perkins applanation tonometer in children.
- IOP readings were highest at T1 (under sedation) for both devices and in both subject groups.
- These findings suggest that clinicians should be aware of the device-specific differences when interpreting IOP measurements in pediatric patients.
Abstract:
Objective: We aimed to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using iCare® PRO rebound tonometry (iCare) and Perkins applanation tonometry (Perkins) in childhood glaucoma subjects and healthy children and the influence of anaesthesia depth, age and corneal thickness. Material: Prospective clinical, case-control study of children who underwent an ophthalmologic examination under general anaesthesia according to our protocol. Children were 45.45 ± 29.76 months old (mean ± SD (standard deviation)). Of all children, 54.05% were female. IOP was taken three times (T1−T3), according to duration and the depth of anaesthesia. The order of measurement alternated, starting with iCare. Agreement between the device measurements was evaluated using Bland−Altman analysis. Results: 53 glaucoma subjects and 22 healthy controls. Glaucoma subjects: IOP measured with iCare was at T1: 27.2 (18.1−33.8), T2: 21.6 (14.8−30.6), T3: 20.4 mmHg (14.5−27.0) and Perkins 17.5 (12.0−23.0), 15.5 (10.5−20.5), 15.0 mmHg (10.5−21.0) (median ± IQR (interquartile range)). Healthy controls: IOP with iCare: T1: 13.3 (11.1−17.0), T2: 10.6 (8.1−12.4), T3: 9.6 mmHg (7.7−11.7) and Perkins 10.3 (8.0−12.0), 7.0 (5.5−10.5), 7.0 mmHg (5.5−8.5) (median ± IQR). The median IOP was statistically significantly higher with iCare than with Perkins (p < 0.001) in both groups. The mean difference (iCare and Perkins) was 6.0 ± 6.1 mmHg for T1−T3, 7.3 at T1, 6.0 at T2, 4.9 mmHg at T3. Conclusion: The IOP was the highest in glaucoma subjects and healthy children at T1 (under sedation), independently of the measurement method. iCare always leads to higher IOP compared to Perkins in glaucoma and healthy subjects, regardless of the duration of anesthesia.
Related Concept Videos
Glaucoma: Overview
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment

