Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Continuous Venous-Arterial Doppler Ultrasound During a Preload Challenge
Published on: January 20, 2023
Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?
Xavier Monnet1, Rui Shi2, Jean-Louis Teboul2
1AP-HP, Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 4 CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, FHU SEPSIS, CARMAS, Université Paris-Saclay, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. xavier.monnet@aphp.fr.
This review examines recent advances in predicting fluid responsiveness for circulatory failure. New methods for passive leg raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests offer improved accuracy without invasive cardiac output monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Critical care medicine
- Hemodynamic monitoring
- Fluid resuscitation
Background:
- Fluid administration is a cornerstone of circulatory failure treatment.
- Fluid therapy presents challenges: inconsistent cardiac output response and risks of fluid overload.
- Accurate prediction of fluid responsiveness is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review recent (past three years) advancements in tests predicting fluid responsiveness.
- To evaluate novel surrogates and methods for assessing fluid responsiveness.
- To discuss the limitations and applications of various fluid responsiveness prediction tests.
Main Methods:
- Review of recently published data on fluid responsiveness prediction tests.
- Detailed examination of passive leg raising test surrogates and their measurement.
- Analysis of end-expiratory occlusion test advancements and non-invasive cardiac output assessment.
- Evaluation of respiratory variation indices (pulse pressure variation, VCI diameter) and their application.
- Discussion of tidal volume challenge, mini-fluid challenge, and Trendelenburg maneuver.
Main Results:
- New stroke volume surrogates enhance passive leg raising test interpretation.
- Non-invasive methods for assessing end-expiratory occlusion test effects are emerging.
- Tidal volume challenge shows increasing reliability for predicting fluid responsiveness without direct cardiac output measurement.
- Mini-fluid challenge requires precise cardiac output measurement, with ongoing research into alternative assessment methods.
- Trendelenburg maneuver presents a potential alternative for prone patients.
Conclusions:
- Recent research offers improved, often less invasive, methods for predicting fluid responsiveness.
- Understanding the limitations of each test, particularly in specific patient populations (e.g., intra-abdominal hypertension), is essential.
- Continued development in hemodynamic monitoring aims to optimize fluid management in critical care.
Related Concept Videos
Characteristics of Fluids
Measurement of Fluid Pressure
A basic form of manometer is the piezometer, a vertical tube open at the top and filled with the same...
Body Water Content and Fluid Compartments
Fluid Pressure
According to Pascal's law, a fluid at rest will generate equal pressure in all directions. This pressure is measured as a force per unit area, and its magnitude depends on the fluid's specific...
Types of Fluids
In contrast, non-Newtonian fluids do not follow Newton's law of viscosity, and...
Pressure of Fluids

