Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

55.8K
Overview
55.8K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

248.8K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
248.8K
Purpose of Health Records I01:11

Purpose of Health Records I

1.4K
The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
1.4K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

54.8K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
54.8K
Feedback Loops01:01

Feedback Loops

58.7K
In most cases, excessive hormone production is prevented by negative feedback—a loop that starts with a stimulus inducing the release of a particular substance, like a hormone, to maintain a certain level before triggering a signal that results in a decrease in further release of the hormone.
58.7K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

185
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
185

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Management of Acute Infectious Purpura Fulminans.

ATS scholar·2026
Same author

Evaluation of Duration of Mechanical Ventilation Associated with Short-Course Midazolam Infusion in the Emergency Department.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same author

A Bedside Assessment of Auto-Positive End-Expiratory Pressure: Identifying Expiratory Flow Limitation.

ATS scholar·2026
Same author

A "PalliPulm" framework to improve palliative care education and practice in pulmonary-critical care medicine: an official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2026
Same author

Management of Leukostasis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

ATS scholar·2025
Same author

Multidisciplinary Approach to Early Mobility at an Academic Medical Center.

Critical care medicine·2025
Same journal

A Cost-Effective High Task Alignment Model for Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization Training.

ATS scholar·2026
Same journal

Foundational Elements of a Successful Innovation Pitch to Venture Capital: The Business of Science for the Physician-Scientist.

ATS scholar·2026
Same journal

Participant experience of a low-carbon, hybrid 'spoke-and-hub', small-format lung health conference.

ATS scholar·2026
Same journal

I Can See Your HALO: Consensus-based List of High Acuity, Low Occurrence Procedures for Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Training.

ATS scholar·2026
Same journal

Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy in Pulmonary Disease Training.

ATS scholar·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.7K

How We Review a Medical Education Research Manuscript.

Margaret M Hayes1, Henry E Fessler2

  • 1Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and.

ATS Scholar
|May 31, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Effective peer review is crucial for advancing scientific rigor, especially in medical education research. This process requires multiple readings and detailed feedback to improve manuscript quality and publication standards.

Keywords:
educationpeer reviewscholarship

More Related Videos

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.0K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

718

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.7K
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.0K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

718

Area of Science:

  • Scholarly publishing
  • Medical education research
  • Scientific communication

Background:

  • Peer review is essential for scholarly publication quality.
  • Effective peer review skills are often not formally taught.
  • Rigor in medical education research relies heavily on robust peer review.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a detailed process for conducting thorough peer reviews of medical education research manuscripts.
  • To provide guidance for reviewers to enhance the quality of scientific publications.
  • To improve the scientific rigor within the field of medical education.

Main Methods:

  • Conducting a multi-stage reading process for manuscript evaluation.
  • Initial reading for overview of aims and methods.
  • Subsequent readings focusing on detailed methodology, results, and interpretation.

Main Results:

  • A thorough review requires multiple readings and significant time investment.
  • Detailed feedback, even for rejected manuscripts, aids author improvement.
  • The described process aims to enhance reviewer effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • A structured approach to peer review improves scientific manuscript quality.
  • Training and clear processes are needed to develop effective peer reviewers.
  • Sharing best practices can elevate the standard of publications in medical education research.