Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
Dual-cure dental composites: can light curing interfere with conversion?
Candace B Windle1, Anne E Hill2, Daranee Tantbirojn2
1College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 875 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Dual-cure dental composites offer dual activation for deep restorations. One composite showed consistent hardness regardless of curing method, while others were negatively impacted by light exposure during self-curing.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Polymer Chemistry
- Biomaterials Engineering
Background:
- Dual-cure composites combine light-activated and self-activated polymerization for dental restorations.
- Achieving adequate depth of cure is crucial for the mechanical properties and longevity of dental restorations.
- Understanding the interplay between photo- and self-curing mechanisms is essential for optimizing composite performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the depth of cure of four dual-cure composites based on their light- and self-cure capabilities.
- To compare the curing performance of dual-cure composites against conventional light-cure bulk fill and universal composites.
- To investigate the influence of curing mode on the hardness of dual-cure composites at various depths.
Main Methods:
- Four dual-cure composites (BulkEZ, Activa, HyperFIL, Injectafil) and two light-cure composites (Tetric, TPH) were tested.
- Composites were cured using irradiation from one direction or allowed to self-cure without irradiation.
- Vickers hardness was measured at depths up to 6 mm.
- Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA and pairwise comparisons.
Main Results:
- Hardness significantly decreased with depth in most light- and dual-cured composites, with BulkEZ being an exception.
- Self-cured dual-cure composites maintained consistent hardness throughout their depth.
- BulkEZ demonstrated consistent hardness irrespective of the curing mode (light-cure vs. self-cure).
- Irradiation negatively impacted the hardness of HyperFIL and Injectafil in their middle sections compared to self-cured samples.
- Two dual-cure composites showed reduced hardness when light-cured, indicating interference with self-polymerization.
Conclusions:
- Dual-cure composites can achieve substantial cure through 6 mm depths, but their curing behavior varies significantly.
- BulkEZ exhibited superior performance, unaffected by curing mode, suggesting robust dual-cure functionality.
- In certain dual-cure composites, light exposure can interfere with the self-polymerization process, potentially compromising restoration integrity.
- The findings highlight the importance of selecting dual-cure composites with predictable curing characteristics for reliable dental restorations.
More Related Videos
16:30Application of Light-cured Dental Adhesive Resin for Mounting Electrodes or Microdialysis Probes in Chronic Experiments
Published on: July 30, 2007
07:04Confocal Time Lapse Imaging as an Efficient Method for the Cytocompatibility Evaluation of Dental Composites
Published on: November 9, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Accelerated Curing of Concrete
Curing of Concrete
Curing Methods