Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.9K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

163
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
163
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

713
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
713
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

13.0K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
13.0K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

280
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
280
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

310
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
310

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of methods for assessing effects of risk factors on disease progression in Mendelian randomization under index event bias.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same author

The Authors Respond.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Opioid use disorder and dementia risk: evidence from observational and genetic analyses in diverse ancestry cohorts.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Integrating genetic data with biological insight: A practical guide to cis-Mendelian randomization.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same author

Antidiabetic drug effects on gastrointestinal health: convergent evidence from a longitudinal cohort and Mendelian randomization study.

Journal of advanced research·2026
Same author

Genetically proxied IL-6 signaling inhibition, lipoprotein(a) levels, and atherosclerotic disease risk.

Atherosclerosis·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.7K

Avoiding collider bias in Mendelian randomization when performing stratified analyses.

Claudia Coscia1,2, Dipender Gill3,4,5,6, Raquel Benítez1

  • 1Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), and CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.

European Journal of Epidemiology
|May 31, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mendelian randomization (MR) can be biased by colliders. This study introduces a novel residual collider method to obtain unbiased causal estimates when stratifying MR analyses, crucial for understanding risk factor effects in subgroups.

Keywords:
Bladder cancerBodyweightCollider biasMendelian randomizationSmokingStratification

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.2K
Improving Small RNA-seq: Less Bias and Better Detection of 2'-O-Methyl RNAs
08:49

Improving Small RNA-seq: Less Bias and Better Detection of 2'-O-Methyl RNAs

Published on: September 16, 2019

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.7K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.2K
Improving Small RNA-seq: Less Bias and Better Detection of 2'-O-Methyl RNAs
08:49

Improving Small RNA-seq: Less Bias and Better Detection of 2'-O-Methyl RNAs

Published on: September 16, 2019

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer causal relationships.
  • Stratifying MR analyses by population characteristics can reveal effect heterogeneity but risks collider bias.
  • Collider bias arises when a variable is a common effect of both the exposure and the outcome, or their common causes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel statistical approach to perform Mendelian randomization in population strata while avoiding collider bias.
  • To develop a method for valid causal inference in subgroup analyses within MR studies.
  • To investigate the causal effect of smoking on bladder cancer, accounting for bodyweight as a potential collider.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced a 'residual collider' variable derived from regressing the collider on the genetic instrument.
  • Calculated Mendelian randomization estimates stratified by quantiles of the residual collider.
  • Validated the approach through simulation studies with varying collider and instrument characteristics.
  • Applied the method to real-world data examining smoking and bladder cancer risk across bodyweight strata.

Main Results:

  • The proposed residual collider method yielded unbiased Mendelian randomization estimates in all simulated scenarios.
  • Stratum-specific estimates in the smoking-bladder cancer example showed a trend suggesting stronger effects at lower bodyweight.
  • The approach effectively mitigates collider bias in stratified MR analyses.

Conclusions:

  • The residual collider method provides a robust framework for conducting Mendelian randomization subgroup analyses without collider bias.
  • This approach enhances the reliability of causal inference for risk factors across diverse population subgroups.
  • The findings highlight the potential utility of this method for exploring effect modification in epidemiological research.