Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Z-Scores for Assessing Ovarian Reserve in Young Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation
Published on: October 25, 2024
Pediatric Ovarian Torsion: Should You Go With the Flow?
Morgan J Sims1, Amanda B Price2, Leslie E Hirsig3
1From the Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Objectives:
Ovarian torsion (OT) is an emergency that mandates early detection and surgical detorsion to avoid catastrophic consequences of further adnexal injury. Prompt ultrasound is critical for accurate diagnosis. Traditionally, evaluation of arterial and venous flow was used as a diagnostic tool for OT, but recent radiologic research has indicated that ovarian size and size discrepancy between sides is a better diagnostic criterion. This study seeks to determine whether ovarian size discrepancy or vascular flow to the ovary is more accurate in the diagnosis of OT in the pediatric emergency population and to better describe symptoms that distinguish OT from other abdominal and pelvic pathology.
Methods:
This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study evaluating all female pediatric patients, aged 1 to 18 years, who underwent a pelvic ultrasound to evaluate for OT over a 2-year period in our pediatric emergency department. Patients suitable for inclusion were identified via Nuance mPowerTM, a search engine that provides clinical analytics based on radiology reports generated within our institution.
Results:
We reviewed the medical records of 193 female patients aged 1 to 18 years, all of whom had a pelvic ultrasound (with or without Doppler) to evaluate for OT during the study period. In comparing ovarian size on ultrasound, patients with OT had a significantly larger magnitude of difference in ovarian volume than patients without torsion (5.57× [interquartile range, 3-12.5] vs 1.56× [interquartile range, 1.24-2.25; P < 0.001]). Ovarian torsion was associated with a 33-fold increased risk of lack of arterial flow (relative risk, 33.33) and with a 9-fold increased risk of lack of venous flow (relative risk, 9.27), when compared with those patients without OT. Patients with OT were significantly more likely to have emesis and peritoneal signs on examination, as well as previous history of OT (P = 0.01, 0.02, and 0.002, respectively) than those without OT. All patients with OT reported abdominal pain.
Conclusions:
We found that a large size discrepancy between ovaries is indicative of OT. Our data also suggest that presence of Doppler flow on ultrasound cannot be used to exclude OT but that lack of Doppler flow on ultrasound is a significant diagnostic marker. As previous studies have also found, clinical symptoms of OT are nonspecific and do not offer any certainty in differentiating OT from other pathologies.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi V: Nursing Management
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

