Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Hemostatic biomarkers and antithrombotic strategy in percutaneous left atrial interventions: State-of-the-art review
Errol W Aarnink1, Marina F M Huijboom1, Willem L Bor2
1Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Insights
Percutaneously closing heart defects with devices can cause blood clots. Coagulation activation, not platelet issues, appears key, suggesting anticoagulation may be better than antiplatelets for managing these risks.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomarker Research
Background:
- Percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects, patent foramen ovale, and left atrial appendage is common.
- Thromboembolic events are significant complications following these procedures.
- Optimal post-procedural antithrombotic management remains under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the mechanisms of left atrial device-related thrombus and thromboembolic complications.
- To evaluate the temporal changes in coagulation and platelet activation post-procedure.
- To identify potential biomarkers for predicting device-related complications.
Main Methods:
- Monitoring of coagulation activation biomarkers after percutaneous device placement.
- Assessment of platelet reactivity following interventions.
- Analysis of endothelial activation and fibrinolysis markers.
Main Results:
- Biomarkers of coagulation activation were elevated post-procedure, peaking at one month and normalizing by three months.
- Platelet reactivity did not show a significant post-procedural increase.
- Elevated coagulation activation suggests a potential role for anticoagulation therapy.
Conclusions:
- Current antiplatelet-based regimens may not be optimal for preventing device-related thrombus.
- Anticoagulation therapy might be a more suitable strategy.
- Biomarkers of endothelial activation, fibrinolysis, and platelet reactivity could guide personalized antithrombotic strategies.
Abstract:
Atrial septal defect, persistent foramen ovale and the left atrial appendage are nowadays often percutaneously closed with implantable devices. These interventions may be complicated by thromboembolic events and the perfect post-procedural antithrombotic management is still under investigation. The mechanisms leading to left atrial device-related thrombus and thromboembolic complications are not fully understood. Biomarkers of coagulation activation are elevated following percutaneous device placement, peaking within one month and returning to baseline values after three months. By contrast, platelet reactivity shows no post-procedural increase. This suggests that an optimal antithrombotic regimen should perhaps include (oral) anticoagulation therapy rather than the currently more frequently prescribed antiplatelet-based regimen. Furthermore, biomarkers of endothelial activation, fibrinolysis, and on-treatment platelet reactivity may be of value in predicting device-related thrombus and bleeding and guide future medical strategy, facilitating personalized medicine.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview

