Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

A Data Integration Workflow to Identify Drug Combinations Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions
Published on: May 27, 2021
Comparison of different decision support software programs in perspective of potential drug-drug interactions in the
Muhammed Yunus Bektay1,2, Zehra Seker3, Hatice Kubra Eke4
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Introduction:
One of the most intriguing situations for healthcare providers is cancer therapy. Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) account for 20-30% of all adverse effects. Cancer patients are more likely to have potential-DDIs since they are taking other drugs with anticancer treatments to prevent the side effects of chemotherapeutic agents. The purpose of this research is to compare various decision support software (CDSS) programs in terms of potential DDIs.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was carried out. A clinical pharmacist assessed the treatment regimens of 231 cancer patients. pDDIs were evaluated using three sources: Lexicomp®, Medscape®, and Micromedex®. The ethical approval was given in November 2017 with decision number 21/286.
Results:
A total of 231 participants who were receiving therapy and had a median age of 61.5 ± 9.18 years were assessed. Almost half of the patients (49%) were female, and 155 had at least one comorbidity in addition to cancer. Medscape had a substantial pDDI ratio of 7.09%, Micromedex had a ratio of 11.15%, and Lexicomp had a ratio of 19.50%. The total number of pDDIs for major/X/contraindicated were 363-2716 (1.56-11.7 pDDI/patient) for Medscape®, 60-1723 (0.26-7.4 pDDI/patient) for Micromedex, and 145-984 (0.62-2.24 pDDI/patient) for Lexicomp®. One of the most common pDDI found was diclofenac and dexamethasone. Interactions between escitalopram and granisetron were also common, and different CDSSs made different recommendations.
Conclusions:
In this study, significant disparities in the quantity and severity of CDSS across distinct CDSS were discovered. One of the major finding of our study was suboptimal prescribing. To address this issue, regulatory organizations should establish and verify validation and reporting mechanisms.
Insights
Cancer patients face significant risks from drug-drug interactions (DDIs). This study found major differences in how cancer decision support software (CDSS) identifies potential DDIs, highlighting a need for improved validation.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Pharmacy
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) contribute to 20-30% of adverse events.
- Cancer patients are at higher risk for DDIs due to polypharmacy with chemotherapeutic agents.
- Identifying and managing potential DDIs is crucial for patient safety in cancer care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of different clinical decision support software (CDSS) programs in identifying potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) in cancer patients.
- To evaluate the discrepancies in pDDI detection and severity assessment among various CDSS.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 231 cancer patients.
- Clinical pharmacists assessed patient treatment regimens.
- Potential DDIs were evaluated using three distinct CDSS: Lexicomp®, Medscape®, and Micromedex®.
Main Results:
- Lexicomp® identified the highest pDDI ratio (19.50%), followed by Micromedex® (11.15%) and Medscape® (7.09%).
- Significant variations in the number and severity of pDDIs were observed across the evaluated CDSS.
- Common pDDIs included diclofenac/dexamethasone and escitalopram/granisetron, with differing recommendations from each CDSS.
Conclusions:
- Substantial disparities exist in the detection and reporting of pDDIs among different CDSS.
- The findings underscore the issue of suboptimal prescribing in cancer care.
- Regulatory bodies should implement and verify robust validation and reporting mechanisms for CDSS.
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...
Combined Effects of Drugs: Antagonism
The most common type is receptor antagonism, where one drug acts as an antagonist to block the effects of another drug by...
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Drug Interactions
Displacement interactions can have varying outcomes, ranging from toxicity to virtually...
Cancer Survival Analysis

