Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Deliberating options for nature-based river development: Insights from a participatory multi-criteria evaluation
Mario Brillinger1, Sebastian Scheuer2, Christian Albert3
1Ruhr University Bochum, Institute of Geography, Universitätsstraße 150, 44805, Bochum, Germany; Leibniz University Hannover, Institute of Environmental Planning, Herrenhäuser Straße 2, 30419, Hannover, Germany.
Nature-based solutions (NBS) show promise for river landscape challenges, with participants agreeing on their positive impacts on biodiversity and water quality. Deliberation helped align preferences for medium NBS interventions, though implementation hurdles remain.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Management
- River Ecology
- Conservation Planning
Background:
- Societal challenges in river landscapes necessitate innovative solutions.
- Nature-based solutions (NBS) offer a promising approach with varying impacts on ecosystems and human well-being.
- Participatory multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) is underutilized in planning NBS for riverine environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate individual and collaborative judgments of agency representatives regarding river development options.
- To analyze river development alternatives with different levels of NBS interventions.
- To enhance understanding of participatory MCE application in river landscape planning.
Main Methods:
- Employed a process tracing approach with participatory multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) for four river development alternatives.
- Utilized weighted linear aggregation, descriptive statistics, principal component analysis, and decision tree modeling for data analysis.
- Conducted a rigorous participatory MCE with agency representatives for an exemplary German river.
Main Results:
- Participants reached consensus on the positive effects of NBS on biodiversity and water quality.
- Ecological dimensions were consistently prioritized over non-ecological ones by participants.
- Individual preferences for river development alternatives converged during the deliberation process.
Conclusions:
- A general preference emerged for medium-level NBS interventions, balancing ecological benefits and practical considerations.
- Potential implementation challenges for NBS in river landscapes were identified.
- Key questions for future MCE of NBS were proposed to guide effective planning and decision-making.
More Related Videos
11:53Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
08:56Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates
Published on: January 13, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Quality of Water
Design Example: Design of an Irrigation Channel
Typical Model Studies
Rapidly Varying Flow
Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment