Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

07:52
Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum
Published on: February 12, 2017
8.8K
The dissociable effects of reward on sequential motor behavior
Sebastian Sporn1,2, Xiuli Chen1, Joseph M Galea1
1School of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Journal of Neurophysiology
|June 1, 2022
Summary
Monetary incentives rapidly improve motor task speed, while performance feedback drives learning. Combining both maximizes gains and enhances movement efficiency through fusion, with lasting effects.
Area of Science:
- Motor control and learning
- Neuroscience of reward
- Human motor behavior
Background:
- Reward enhances motor behavior, but its specific mechanisms remain unclear.
- Distinct reward types may drive different performance improvements.
- Lack of mechanistic understanding for reward's impact on motor learning.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate if monetary incentive and performance feedback drive distinct motor improvements.
- Determine the combined effects of these reward types on motor task performance.
- Elucidate the mechanisms underlying reward-driven motor behavior changes.
Main Methods:
- Novel sequential reaching task to assess motor performance.
- Experimental manipulation of reward types: monetary incentive and performance feedback.
- Analysis of movement time, fusion, speed, and efficiency.
Main Results:
- Monetary incentive rapidly improved movement times (MTs).
- Performance feedback led to learning-related improvements.
- Combining both maximized MT gains and accelerated movement fusion.
- Fusion enhanced speed and efficiency, with improvements persisting for 24 hours.
Conclusions:
- Monetary incentive and performance feedback have dissociable effects on motor behavior.
- Combining reward types maximizes performance gains and movement quality.
- Movement fusion is a key mechanism for reward-driven motor optimization.
- Findings provide a mechanistic framework for reward's influence on motor learning.
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
159
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
159
Reinforcement Schedules
244
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
Once a behavior is learned,...
244
Law of Effect
1.7K
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
1.7K
Instinctive Drift
331
Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...
331

