Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025
Enucleation of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Using a 980 nm Diode Laser
Published on: May 5, 2020
Efficacy and Safety of Transurethral Enucleation with Bipolar Energy for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia:
Yuki Endo1, Hiroyuki Shimizu2, Jun Akatsuka1
1Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School.
Background:
We evaluated the association of prostate volume (PV) with the efficacy and safety of transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy (TUEB) for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Methods:
We retrospectively evaluated data from 180 patients with symptomatic BPH who underwent TUEB between 2008 and 2015. Efficacy was assessed by perioperative changes in international prostate symptom score (IPSS), Quality of Life Score (QOLS), maximum flow rate on uroflowmetry (Qmax), and serum prostate-specific antigen level (PSA), which were recorded at 3 months postoperatively. Safety was assessed by perioperative incidence of adverse events (AEs). AEs were recorded up to 2 years after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on PV as the standard group (SG; PV < 80 mL) and large group (LG; PV ≥ 80 mL).
Results:
A total of 132 (73%) patients were grouped as the SG, and 48 (27%) were grouped as the LG. No significant differences between the groups were observed in the preoperative variables age, IPSS, and QOLS. However, the LG had a significantly larger PV and higher serum PSA levels. Analysis of surgical outcomes revealed that postoperative changes in IPSS, QOLS, Qmax, serum PSA, serum sodium, and hemoglobin levels did not differ significantly between groups. However, LG had a significantly longer operative time and heavier specimen weight. The rates of early complications, including hyponatremia and blood transfusion, and late complications after surgery did not differ between the groups.
Conclusion:
The present findings suggest that TUEB is safe and effective for treatment of BPH, regardless of PV.
