Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Radical Reactivity: Overview01:11

Radical Reactivity: Overview

2.2K
Radicals, the highly reactive species, gain stability by undergoing three different reactions. The first reaction involves a radical-radical coupling, in which a radical combines with another radical, forming a spin‐paired molecule. The second reaction is between a radical and a spin‐paired molecule, generating a new radical and a new spin‐paired molecule. The third reaction is radical decomposition in a unimolecular reaction, forming a new radical and a spin‐paired...
2.2K
Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals01:16

Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals

2.2K
Radicals adjacent to electron-donating groups are called nucleophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with electrophilic alkenes. The SOMO–LUMO interactions are the driving force for the reaction, where the high-energy SOMO of the electron-rich, nucleophilic radicals interacts with the low-energy LUMO of the electron-deficient, electrophilic alkenes. Such SOMO–LUMO interactions are the basis of reactive radical traps, affecting the selectivity in radical reactions. For...
2.2K
Radical Reactivity: Electrophilic Radicals01:02

Radical Reactivity: Electrophilic Radicals

2.0K
Radicals adjacent to electron‐withdrawing groups are called electrophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with nucleophilic alkenes. For example, the malonate radical, in which the radical center is flanked by two electron‐withdrawing groups, reacts readily with butyl vinyl ether, which consists of an electron‐donating oxygen substituent. The reaction between electrophilic malonate radical and nucleophilic vinyl ether is favored because the radical has a...
2.0K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

35.7K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.7K
Radicals: Electronic Structure and Geometry01:07

Radicals: Electronic Structure and Geometry

4.3K
This lesson delves into the geometry of a radical, which is influenced by the electronic structure of the molecule. The principle is similar to that of a lone pair, where the unpaired electron influences the geometry at the radical center.
Accordingly, the structure of a trivalent radical lies between the geometries of carbocations and carbanions. An sp2-hybridized carbocation is trigonal planar, while an sp3-hybridized carbanion is trigonal pyramidal. Here, the difference in geometry is...
4.3K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

376
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
376

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding stress-induced illegitimate aggression: the role of physiological and psychological factors in police cadets.

Biologia futura·2025
Same author

The Effects of <i>Echinacea</i> (EP107<sup>TM</sup>) on Anxiety: A Comparison of Anxiety Measures in a Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Herbal Cannabis and Depression: A Review of Findings Published over the Last Three Years.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Uncovering the most robust predictors of problematic pornography use: A large-scale machine learning study across 16 countries.

Journal of psychopathology and clinical science·2024
Same author

The role of the GABAergic cells of the median raphe region in reinforcement-based learning.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Anxiety Modulation by Cannabinoids-The Role of Stress Responses and Coping.

International journal of molecular sciences·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.2K

Risk Matrix for Violent Radicalization: A Machine Learning Approach.

Krisztián Ivaskevics1, József Haller1

  • 1Department of Criminal Psychology, Faculty of Law Enforcement, University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary.

Frontiers in Psychology
|June 1, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning identified 19 critical factors predicting violent extremism with 86.3% accuracy. This research helps identify individuals at risk of radicalization and violence.

Keywords:
XGBoostmachine learningrisk assessmentterrorismviolent extremism

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.4K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.2K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.4K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Computational social science
  • Behavioral psychology
  • Criminology

Background:

  • Previous hypothesis-driven studies offered limited explanations for violent radicalization.
  • These studies focused on a restricted set of preselected variables, leading to fragmented understanding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively analyze all variables in the "Profiles of Individual Radicalization in the United States" database.
  • To identify critical predictors of violent extremism using a machine learning approach without prior assumptions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a machine learning approach on the "Profiles of Individual Radicalization in the United States" database.
  • Analyzed 79 variables to identify those critical for predicting violence.

Main Results:

  • Identified 19 critical variables predicting violent extremism with 86.3% accuracy.
  • Violent extremists typically had criminal, not radical, backgrounds, were radicalized later in life, followed terrorist groups, sought training, and used social media.
  • Non-violent extremists had radical family traditions, higher social strata, and led organizations.

Conclusions:

  • Developed a risk matrix based on critical characteristics to predict individual-level violence risk.
  • Findings differentiate violent from non-violent extremists and inform risk assessment strategies.