Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of T, B and Myeloid Cells Suppressive Activity and Humoral Responses from Transplant Recipients
Published on: August 12, 2017
Chronic lung allograft dysfunction and restrictive allograft syndrome: are phenotypes robust and helpful?
Geert M Verleden1,2, Laurent Godinas1,2, Robin Vos1,2
1Department of Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Gasthuisberg.
Purpose Of Review:
New chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) consensus documents were published in 2019, defining four phenotypes; bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, restrictive allograft syndrome, mixed and undefined. Clearly, validation of these guidelines in a real life cohort is critical.
Recent Findings:
Indeed, validation has been performed recently, both after bilateral lung transplantation (LTx) and after single LTx illustrating that precise phenotyping based on pulmonary function alone can be difficult. Undertaking regular chest computed tomography scanning does appear very helpful in establishing the prognosis of the patients with CLAD.
Summary:
Pulmonary function changes may not always identify the exact phenotype of CLAD and we provide further evidence for the important role of chest imaging at diagnosis and during the follow-up of patients with CLAD.
More Related Videos
09:23Author Spotlight: Enhancing Transplantation Research Through MicroCT Angiography in Murine Models
Published on: September 22, 2023
04:42Author Spotlight: Analyzing Fibrosis Development in Chronic Lung Allograft Rejection Using Picrosirius Red Staining in Mouse Models
Published on: March 21, 2025