Comparative survival following permanent ventricular and dual-chamber pacing for patients with chronic symptomatic...

To determine whether survival following permanent ventricular demand pacing differs from survival following permanent dual-chamber pacing in patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunction (unexplained sinus bradycardia, subsidiary rhythms, sinus arrest, sinoatrial block, or the bradycardia/tachycardia syndrome), we followed 79 patients who received a VVI pacemaker (group 1) and 49 patients who received a DVI or DDD pacemaker (group 2) for 1 to 5 years. There was no significant difference in sex distribution, mean age, or the incidence of coronary heart disease, hypertension, valvular heart disease, diabetes mellitus, stroke, or renal failure between groups 1 and 2. Overall, the predicted cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 89%, 82%, and 74%, respectively, for group 1 and 94%, 86%, and 78%, respectively, for group 2. In patients with preexistent congestive heart failure (CHF), predicted cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 78%, 69%, and 57%, respectively, for group 1 (n = 23) and 90%, 83%, and 75%, respectively, for group 2 (n = 16). Five-year predicted cumulative survival was significantly lower in group 1 patients with CHF than in group 2 patients with CHF (p less than 0.03). There was no significant difference in 5-year cumulative survival rates between groups 1 and 2 in patients without CHF. The results suggest that permanent dual-chamber pacing enhances survival to a greater extent than permanent ventricular demand pacing in patients with chronic symptomatic sinus node dysfunction and CHF.