Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Computed Tomography

Computed Tomography

Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

DefinitionComputed Tomography (CT) of the genitourinary (GU) tract is a non-invasive imaging modality that utilizes X-rays and computer processing to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the urinary system, encompassing the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and adjacent structures such as the adrenal glands.PurposeCT scans of the GU tract serve several diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including:Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Diseases: Detects kidney stones, tumors, cysts, and congenital...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Diagnostic challenge: Case 14, part 1.

Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO·2026

Same author

Diagnostic challenge: Case 14, part 2.

Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO·2026

Same author

Craniofacial growth percentile curves: A clinical tool from the Craniofacial Growth Consortium Study.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026

Same author

Stability of transverse changes with clear aligners and hyrax expanders from the mixed to the permanent dentition.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026

Same author

Enhanced characterization of acquired oronasal communications in dogs by cone-beam computed tomography: findings, risk factors, and clinical utility.

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2026

Same author

Airway changes in growing Class II patients treated with Herbst appliance: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing dental and skeletal anchorage.

Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

Automated landmark identification on cone-beam computed tomography: Accuracy and reliability.

Ali Ghowsi, David Hatcher, Heeyeon Suh

The Angle Orthodontist

|June 2, 2022

Summary

A new automated landmark identification (ALI) system demonstrates accuracy comparable to human judges in locating landmarks on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. This ALI system shows promise for assisting orthodontists with landmark identification tasks.

Keywords:

3D landmark identification Accuracy Automated CBCT Landmark error Reliability

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Area of Science:

Dentistry
Medical Imaging
Orthodontics

Background:

Accurate landmark identification on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is crucial for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Manual landmark identification by human judges can be time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a fully automated landmark identification (ALI) system.
To compare the performance of the ALI system against human judges for landmark localization on CBCT images.

Main Methods:

100 CBCT images were analyzed.
Two human judges identified 53 landmarks in 3D coordinates.
The ground truth was established by averaging human landmark coordinates.
Accuracy was assessed using mean absolute error and mean error distance, with a success rate calculation.

Main Results:

The ALI system achieved an average mean absolute error of 1.57 mm across all coordinates.
94% of landmarks had a mean absolute error under 3 mm.
The system demonstrated a 75% success rate in detecting landmarks within a 4 mm error distance.

Conclusions:

The ALI system exhibited clinically acceptable mean error distances, comparable to human judges.
The ALI system demonstrated higher precision than humans for repeated landmark identification on the same image.
The study highlights the potential of ALI as a valuable tool for orthodontists in CBCT landmark identification.