Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy01:29

Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

362
An Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a diagnostic procedure in which an endoscopist uses a flexible, lighted endoscope to visualize the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The procedure includes visualizing the oropharynx, esophagus, stomach, and the first part of the small intestine, the duodenum.
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
362
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

187
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
187
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy01:28

Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy

338
Capsule endoscopy, or wireless or video capsule endoscopy, is a diagnostic procedure for examining the entire gastrointestinal tract. Patients swallow a capsule about the size of a vitamin tablet. The capsule is equipped with a transmitter, a battery, an LED light source, and a color video camera to capture images throughout the gastrointestinal tract. This procedure is particularly useful for diagnosing conditions such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, tumors, polyps, ulcers,...
338
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy01:25

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

196
The colon, or large intestine, is the final segment of the digestive system. Its primary functions include absorbing water and vitamins produced by gut bacteria and transforming waste from liquid to solid to form stool. In adults, the large intestine is approximately 5 feet long and consists of four main sections:
196
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP01:26

Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP

985
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a diagnostic procedure that combines endoscopy and fluoroscopy to diagnose and treat conditions related to the bile ducts, pancreatic ducts, and gallbladder. This procedure is beneficial for identifying and addressing blockages, gallstones, strictures, and tumors within the biliary or pancreatic systems. ERCP is both diagnostic and therapeutic, offering the ability to visualize and treat identified problems in one session.
Patient...
985
Upper GI Series: Barium Swallow01:24

Upper GI Series: Barium Swallow

971
The Barium Swallow Study, or a Barium Esophagogram, is a diagnostic imaging method used to visualize the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, including the esophagus, stomach, and small intestine. It employs barium sulfate, a radiopaque contrast material, to provide clear images of the upper digestive system, helping to identify abnormalities, diseases, or structural issues.
Purpose and Procedure
Patients undergoing this procedure ingest a liquid containing barium sulfate with a chalky...
971

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Surgery in Late Older Adult Patients Aged ≥75 Years With Early Gastric Cancer Meeting the Curative Resection Criteria.

Journal of gastric cancer·2026
Same author

Integrated analysis of gastric microbiome and clinical features for the diagnosis of gastric neoplasms.

Gut pathogens·2026
Same author

Age-Dependent Effects of Gastric Cancer Screening Endoscopy on Mortality: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Endoscopy·2026
Same author

Positive Margins and Lymphovascular Invasion Represent Risk Factors for Remnant Tumor or Late Recurrence in Endoscopic or Local Resection of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Digestion·2026
Same author

How to predict abnormal acid reflux: recent developments.

Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology·2026
Same author

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection of Superficial Nonampullary Duodenal Tumors in South Korea: A 15-Year Retrospective Study.

Gut and liver·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 21, 2025

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
05:57

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Published on: February 10, 2017

8.6K

Quality indicators in esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Sang Yoon Kim1, Jae Myung Park2,3

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.

Clinical Endoscopy
|June 3, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is crucial for diagnosing upper GI diseases and screening gastric cancer. This review examines quality indicators for diagnostic EGD, addressing the need for standardized quality control due to examiner dependency.

Keywords:
Detection rateEsophagogastroduodenoscopyGuidelineNeoplasmsQuality indicators

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Biopsy Techniques with Transesophageal Ultrasound
04:35

Author Spotlight: Advancing Biopsy Techniques with Transesophageal Ultrasound

Published on: November 21, 2023

629
Induction of Intestinal Graft-versus-host Disease and Its Mini-endoscopic Assessment in Live Mice
09:50

Induction of Intestinal Graft-versus-host Disease and Its Mini-endoscopic Assessment in Live Mice

Published on: February 11, 2019

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 21, 2025

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
05:57

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Published on: February 10, 2017

8.6K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Biopsy Techniques with Transesophageal Ultrasound
04:35

Author Spotlight: Advancing Biopsy Techniques with Transesophageal Ultrasound

Published on: November 21, 2023

629
Induction of Intestinal Graft-versus-host Disease and Its Mini-endoscopic Assessment in Live Mice
09:50

Induction of Intestinal Graft-versus-host Disease and Its Mini-endoscopic Assessment in Live Mice

Published on: February 11, 2019

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Endoscopy

Background:

  • Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a primary tool for diagnosing upper gastrointestinal diseases.
  • EGD plays a vital role in screening individuals at high risk for gastric cancer.
  • The diagnostic accuracy of EGD is influenced by the endoscopist, highlighting the need for quality control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing and novel quality indicators for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
  • To address the lack of a uniform quality indicator for EGD procedures.
  • To support the growing emphasis on quality improvement in EGD performance.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of available quality indicators for diagnostic EGD.
  • Identification and analysis of emerging quality indicators in the field.
  • Synthesis of findings to assess the current landscape of EGD quality control.

Main Results:

  • The diagnostic rate of EGD is significantly examiner-dependent.
  • A universally accepted quality indicator for EGD is currently lacking.
  • There is a recognized need for improved quality control measures in EGD.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized quality indicators are essential for improving the reliability of diagnostic EGD.
  • Further research and consensus are needed to establish representative quality indicators.
  • Implementing robust quality control will enhance EGD's effectiveness in diagnosing gastrointestinal conditions and screening for cancer.