Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

An Aquatic Microbial Metaproteomics Workflow: From Cells to Tryptic Peptides Suitable for Tandem Mass Spectrometry-based Analysis
Published on: September 15, 2015
Identification of environmental aquatic bacteria by mass spectrometry supported by biochemical differentiation
Natalija Topić Popović1,2, Slavko Kepec3,4, Snježana P Kazazić5
1Laboratory for Aquaculture Biotechnology, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia.
Abstract:
In this study, the purposefulness of using the API20E biochemical identification system as a supportive tool for enhancing the discrimination of environmental bacteria by MALDI-TOF MS method was evaluated. The identification results of MALDI-TOF MS and API20E for 321 Gram-negative strains isolated from the riverine freshwater and its sediment, and from the tissues of fish from the same water body were compared. Of 190 isolates identified with probable to highly probable species-level identification, and secure genus to probable species identification, 14 isolates (7.37%) had identification score over 2.300, and from the same group 19 isolates (10%) had excellent or very good identification to the genus by API20E system. With regard to agreement at genus level, out of 231 strains with genus designation available by API20E at any level of identification reliability, MALDI-TOF MS genus identification agreed in 163 (70.6%) strains. Of these, 135 (82.8%) were Aeromonas species and the remaining isolates belonged to 7 different genera. Although API20E resulted in frequent misidentification due to a limited profile index, its individual biochemical reactions might contribute to overall characterization of isolates. For example, for all reliable A. hydrophila strain identifications with MALDI-TOF MS, ONPG, GLU and OX reactions were unarguably positive for all fish and water/sediment isolates, whereas only fish isolates yielded additional 100% positive TDA and VP reactions. Thus, after initial identification with MALDI-TOF MS, environmental isolates with lower identification scores should be further analyzed. Before commencing confirmatory testing with nucleic acid-based methods, biochemical API20E tests could be applied as a purposeful and inexpensive identification support in targeting better identification accuracy. In this study, this was particularly evident with A. hydrophila, Chryseobacterium sp. and Pseudomonas sp. This identification strategy could significantly resolve methodological and cost-related shortcomings frequently occurring with large number of environmental isolates.
More Related Videos
11:09Use of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry and a Custom Database to Characterize Bacteria Indigenous to a Unique Cave Environment Kartchner Caverns, AZ, USA
Published on: January 2, 2015
10:03Isolation, Propagation, and Identification of Bacterial Species with Hydrocarbon Metabolizing Properties from Aquatic Habitats
Published on: December 7, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Classification and Identification
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy
MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) is a commonly...