Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
A magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer at radical
Daniele Castellani1, Sara Cecchini2, Roberta Mazzucchelli3
1Unit of Urology, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
Purpose:
To develop a nomogram incorporating clinical and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) parameters for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csCaP) at radical prostatectomy (RP).
Materials And Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients who underwent robotic RP between 2016 and 2020. All patients underwent a 1.5-T mp-MRI according to the PI-RADS-v2 scoring system. RP specimens were examined with the whole-mount technique. csCaP definition: any tumor with a volume larger than 0.5 cm3 or with a Gleason score ≥7. Univariable logistic regression models explored the association between clinical and imaging data and the risk of csCaP. Significant variables (P < 0.05) were selected into multivariable regression models to identify independent predictors. A nomogram was designed to select the significant relevant predictors. The nomogram was internally validated in terms of discrimination and calibration. Receiver operating characteristics of the area under the curve was used to assess the discrimination ability of the nomogram. To assess the predictive performance of mpMRI, the accuracy of the mpMRI-based nomogram was compared with that excluding either PI-RADS score or mpMRI IL size.
Results:
The analysis involved 393 patients. The median age was 65(9) years. The median prostate specific antigen was 5.81(3.76) ng/ml. 363 had csCaP. PI-RADS v2 score of 4-5, prostate specific antigen density of 0.15 or more, and mpMRI index lesion (IL) size were significantly associated with csCaP in the multivariable regression analyses. Based on these variables, a diagnostic model was developed. The full model yielded an area under the curve of 0.77 (95%CI:0.75-0.80) which was significantly better than those excluding mpMRI findings (P = 0.02) Decision curve analysis showed a slight but significant net benefit associated with the use of the mp-MRI based nomograms compared with those excluding either PI-RADS score (Delta net benefit 0.0278) or mpMRI maximum IL size (Delta net benefit 0.0111).
Conclusions:
The nomogram constructed in this study can assist urologists in assessing an individual's risk of csCaP at RP.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
05:49Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
Published on: October 10, 2019