Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

08:49
Cultivating a Three-dimensional Reconstructed Human Epidermis at a Large Scale
Published on: May 28, 2021
11.6K
Updating the Dermal Sensitisation Thresholds using an expanded dataset and an in silico expert system
Martyn L Chilton1, Anne Marie Api2, Robert S Foster1
1Lhasa Limited, Granary Wharf House, 2 Canal Wharf, Leeds, LS11 5PS, UK.
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP
|June 6, 2022
Summary
Updated Dermal Sensitisation Thresholds (DST) provide robust values for skin sensitisation risk assessment. These updated thresholds, based on an expanded dataset and in silico reactivity classification, enhance the reproducibility and accessibility of safety evaluations.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Dermatology
- Computational Chemistry
Background:
- Dermal Sensitisation Thresholds (DST) are established as Thresholds of Toxicological Concern (TTC) for skin sensitisation risk assessment.
- Exposure-based waiving in risk assessments relies on the accurate determination of DST values.
- Previous DST values were derived from a limited Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) dataset.
Purpose of the Study:
- To update existing Dermal Sensitisation Thresholds (DST) by expanding the underlying Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) dataset.
- To assign chemical reactivity using an in silico expert system (Derek Nexus) for improved classification.
- To enhance the robustness and applicability of DSTs in skin sensitisation risk assessments.
Main Methods:
- Expanded the LLNA dataset for sensitisation potency values.
- Utilized Derek Nexus, an in silico expert system, to classify chemical sensitisation activity and identify High Potency Categories (HPC).
- Calculated updated DSTs for non-reactive, reactive (non-HPC), and HPC chemical categories.
Main Results:
- The expanded dataset, comprising 1152 chemicals, maintained a similar gamma distribution for potency values.
- Three updated DSTs were determined: 710 μg/cm² (non-reactive), 73 μg/cm² (reactive, non-HPC), and 1.0 μg/cm² (HPC).
- The updated thresholds demonstrated robustness and similarity to previously published values despite dataset expansion.
Conclusions:
- The updated DSTs, derived from a larger dataset and in silico reactivity assessment, offer reliable values for skin sensitisation risk assessment.
- In silico classification of reactivity ensures reproducible, scalable, and accessible application of DSTs.
- The findings increase confidence in the utility of DSTs for regulatory safety evaluations.

