Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

13.7K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
13.7K
Animal Mitochondrial Genetics02:59

Animal Mitochondrial Genetics

8.1K
Among all the organelles in an animal cell, only mitochondria have their own independent genomes. Animal mitochondrial DNA is a double-stranded, closed-circular molecule with around 20,000 base pairs. Mitochondrial DNA is unique in that one of its two strands, the heavy, or H, -strand is guanine rich, whereas the complementary strand is cytosine rich and called the light, or L, -strand. Compared to nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA has a very low percentage of non-coding regions and is marked by...
8.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Parkinson's disease genetics across diverse ancestries: an observational genetic study of causal and risk variants with translational implications.

The Lancet. Neurology·2026
Same author

Repeat expansions in Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism across ancestries: insights from a global genetic cohort.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

<i>GCH1</i> p.Ser80Asn Confers Risk for Parkinson's Disease in East Asian Populations.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Selective vulnerability of dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson's disease connects PRKN and differential expression of CHCHD2 and GPNMB.

Cell death & disease·2026
Same author

ZFHX4 is necessary for dopaminergic neuron differentiation and controls cell cycle by regulating LIN28A.

Stem cell reports·2026
Same author

Genetic variation in antidiabetic drug targets: associations with Parkinson's disease risk and age at onset.

NPJ Parkinson's disease·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 20, 2025

ATAC-seq Assay with Low Mitochondrial DNA Contamination from Primary Human CD4+ T Lymphocytes
08:36

ATAC-seq Assay with Low Mitochondrial DNA Contamination from Primary Human CD4+ T Lymphocytes

Published on: March 22, 2019

12.8K

Benchmarking Low-Frequency Variant Calling With Long-Read Data on Mitochondrial DNA.

Theresa Lüth1, Susen Schaake1, Anne Grünewald1,2

  • 1Institute of Neurogenetics, University of Lübeck and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.

Frontiers in Genetics
|June 6, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Nanopore sequencing shows promise for detecting low-frequency mitochondrial variants. Mutserve2 variant caller achieved the highest accuracy across various mixture levels, outperforming other tools in this benchmark study.

Keywords:
benchmarkinghaplogroupsheteroplasmylong-readlow-frequency variantmixturesmtDNAnanopore sequencing

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Image-Based Quantification of Mitochondrial DNA Synthesis and Distribution
10:47

Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Image-Based Quantification of Mitochondrial DNA Synthesis and Distribution

Published on: May 5, 2023

3.8K
Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation
12:11

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Published on: May 20, 2018

13.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 20, 2025

ATAC-seq Assay with Low Mitochondrial DNA Contamination from Primary Human CD4+ T Lymphocytes
08:36

ATAC-seq Assay with Low Mitochondrial DNA Contamination from Primary Human CD4+ T Lymphocytes

Published on: March 22, 2019

12.8K
Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Image-Based Quantification of Mitochondrial DNA Synthesis and Distribution
10:47

Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Image-Based Quantification of Mitochondrial DNA Synthesis and Distribution

Published on: May 5, 2023

3.8K
Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation
12:11

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Published on: May 20, 2018

13.5K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Long-read sequencing technologies have advanced, improving the detection of low-frequency somatic variants.
  • Mitochondrial DNA analysis is crucial for understanding various diseases and evolutionary processes.
  • Assessing the accuracy of nanopore sequencing for detecting low-frequency variants is essential for its clinical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark nanopore sequencing for low-frequency single nucleotide variant detection in mitochondrial DNA.
  • To evaluate the impact of different base-calling, alignment, and variant-calling tools on accuracy.
  • To compare nanopore sequencing performance against a short-read gold standard.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized mixtures of mitochondrial samples with known haplogroups at 5%, 2%, and 1% levels.
  • Employed two base-callers (Guppy versions), two aligners (Minimap2, Ngmlr), and three variant callers (Mutserve2, Freebayes, Nanopanel2).
  • Assessed variant-calling performance using F1 scores and compared results to a short-read gold standard.

Main Results:

  • Nanopore sequencing yielded a mean read length of 11 kb and mean quality of 15.
  • Ngmlr aligner showed higher F1 scores but also higher false-positive allele frequencies compared to Minimap2.
  • Mutserve2 variant caller achieved the highest F1 scores across all mixture levels, particularly excelling at lower frequencies.

Conclusions:

  • Nanopore sequencing is a viable tool for low-frequency mitochondrial variant detection.
  • Mutserve2 demonstrates superior performance for variant calling in this context.
  • This study identifies current limitations and provides a benchmark for optimizing nanopore-based variant detection pipelines.