Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Prognostic value of post-treatment fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity in ischemic stroke
Xiao-Quan Xu1, Guang-Chen Shen1, Gao Ma1
1Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300, Guangzhou Rd., Nanjing, China.
Objectives:
To explore the value of post-treatment fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity (FVH) in predicting clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).
Methods:
This retrospective study reviewed data from consecutive patients with large vessel occlusion of anterior circulation between July 2017 and February 2021. Together with other variables, status of post-treatment FVH was assessed for each patient. Good outcome was defined as a 3-month modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2. Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, independent-samples t test, multivariate logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used as appropriate.
Results:
Among 84 included patients, 48 (57.1%) patients showed post-treatment FVH. Post-treatment FVH significantly correlated with incomplete recanalization (p < 0.05) and low Alberta Stroke Project Early CT Changes Score on post-treatment diffusion-weighted imaging (p < 0.05). Higher incidence of hemorrhage transformation was observed in patients with post-treatment FVH than those without (27.1% vs. 16.7%); however, the difference did not reach significance (p = 0.259). Successful recanalization (odds ratio [OR], 0.024; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.003-0.194; p < 0.05), lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at admission (NIHSSpre) (OR, 1.196; 95% CI, 1.017-1.406; p < 0.05), and no post-treatment FVH (OR, 74.690; 95% CI, 4.624-1206.421; p < 0.05) were found to be independent predictors of good outcomes. Combined models integrating all three independent predictors (recanalization+NIHSSpre+post-treatment FVH) significantly outperformed the combined model without post-treatment FVH (recanalization+NIHSSpre) in predicting clinical outcome (p = 0.004).
Conclusions:
Post-treatment FVH may be an effective prognostic marker associated with clinical outcome in patients with AIS after EVT.
Key Points:
• Post-treatment FVH correlates with incomplete recanalization and higher infarct volume. • Post-treatment FVH is independently associated with an unfavorable outcome. • Post-treatment FVH may provide prognostic information in patients with AIS after EVT.
More Related Videos
09:48Quantification of Neurovascular Protection Following Repetitive Hypoxic Preconditioning and Transient Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Mice
Published on: May 4, 2015
10:25Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
Published on: September 25, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies