Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis
Published on: June 27, 2020
Predicting which genes will respond to transcription factor perturbations
Yiming Kang1,2, Wooseok J Jung1,2, Michael R Brent1,2,3
1Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Predicting gene response to transcription factor changes is challenging. Gene expression levels and variation are key predictors, outperforming transcription factor binding data and histone marks in machine learning models.
Area of Science:
- Systems biology
- Genomics
- Computational biology
Background:
- Understanding transcriptional regulatory networks is crucial for predicting gene expression changes.
- Previous machine learning models predicted gene expression using data from the same biological samples.
- Predicting gene responses to transcription factor perturbation without data from perturbed cells presents a significant challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate machine learning models for predicting gene responses to transcription factor perturbation.
- To assess the utility of various genomic features, including transcription factor binding, histone marks, gene expression levels, and expression variation, for this prediction task.
- To identify key molecular features that influence a gene's propensity to respond to transcription factor perturbations.
Main Methods:
- Trained machine learning models to predict gene responses to transcription factor perturbation using pre-perturbation data.
- Evaluated the predictive power of transcription factor location data (ChIP-seq).
- Assessed the contribution of gene expression level, expression variation, histone marks (H3K4me1, H3K4me3), and sequence-based/epigenetic properties.
Main Results:
- Transcription factor location data (ChIP-seq) showed minimal utility in predicting gene responses.
- Pre-perturbation gene expression level and expression variation were highly predictive of responses to any transcription factor perturbation.
- Certain histone marks (H3K4me1, H3K4me3) showed some predictive power when located downstream of the transcription start site, but less than expression-based features.
- Gene expression level and variation effectively summarize sequence-based and epigenetic properties influencing response.
Conclusions:
- Gene expression level and variation are critical determinants of responsiveness to transcription factor perturbation.
- The difficulty in predicting responses from binding locations is partly due to these underlying molecular features being reflected in expression patterns.
- Some genes are inherently poised to respond, while others are resistant, highlighting a systems-level property rather than solely relying on direct binding information.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Transcription Factors
Combinatorial Gene Control
The expression of more than 30,000 genes is controlled by approximately 2000-3000 transcription factors. This is possible because a single transcription factor can recognize more than one regulatory sequence. The specificity in gene...
General Transcription Factors
Diversity in Cell Signaling Responses
Graded and Abrupt Responses
Some signaling systems generate...
What is Gene Expression?
Gene expression is the process in which DNA directs the synthesis of functional products, that is, proteins. Cells can regulate gene expression at various stages. It allows organisms to generate different cell types and enables cells to adapt to internal and external factors.
Genetic Information Flows from DNA to RNA to Protein
A gene is a stretch of DNA that serves as the blueprint for functional RNAs and proteins. Since DNA is made up of nucleotides and proteins consist of amino...
RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins

