Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

35.7K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.7K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.2K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.2K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

45.6K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
45.6K
Magical Thinking01:29

Magical Thinking

2
Magical thinking encompasses the belief in assumptions that defy logical reasoning yet appear intuitively convincing. It is a common psychological phenomenon that persists across various cultural and individual contexts. While these assumptions contradict empirical evidence and scientific laws, they often serve meaningful psychological roles in promoting emotional resilience and a sense of control, especially under stress or uncertainty.Thought-Action Fusion and the Law of SimilarityA key...
2
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

11.4K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.4K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

23.8K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Can Evidential Pluralism mitigate bias and motivated reasoning?

Synthese·2026
Same journal

AI-assisted rational decision-making.

Synthese·2026
Same journal

Technological Understanding: On the cognitive skill involved in the design and use of technological artefacts.

Synthese·2026
Same journal

Addictive Motivational Scaffolds and the Structure of Social Media.

Synthese·2026
Same journal

When do we experience effort?

Synthese·2026
Same journal

Prescriptive 'selves' and self-illness ambiguity.

Synthese·2025
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K

Suspicious conspiracy theories.

M R X Dentith1,2

  • 1Center for International Philosophy, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai, 18 Jinfeng Rd, Zhuhai, 519087 Guangdong China.

Synthese
|June 7, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study examines whether conspiracy theories are epistemically problematic. While some philosophers argue they are, this research suggests certain features only warrant limited suspicion, cautioning against broad generalizations about conspiracy theory warrant.

Keywords:
ConspiracyConspiracy theoristConspiracy theoryEpistemologySocial epistemologySuspicionsWarrant

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.3K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.3K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Epistemology

Background:

  • Conspiracy theories and theorists face accusations of epistemic problems.
  • Philosophical debate exists on whether conspiracy theories are inherently epistemically problematic.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the epistemic status of conspiracy theories.
  • To identify features of conspiracy theories that may warrant suspicion.
  • To analyze the extent to which such suspicions can be generalized.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical argumentation and analysis.
  • Examination of existing literature on conspiracy theories and epistemology.
  • Case study analysis of specific conspiracy theory features.

Main Results:

  • Certain features of conspiracy theories can indeed license suspicion.
  • This suspicion is often limited and does not automatically imply the theory is false.
  • Generalizing suspicions about specific conspiracy theories to all conspiracy theories is cautioned against.

Conclusions:

  • Epistemic evaluation of conspiracy theories requires nuanced analysis.
  • Features warranting suspicion do not always correlate with a theory's falsity.
  • A careful approach is needed to avoid overgeneralizing epistemic judgments about conspiracy theories.