Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.9K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.5K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.5K
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

33.9K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
33.9K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.4K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.4K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.3K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.3K
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition01:24

Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

113
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...
113

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

A simple planning problem for COVID-19 lockdown: a dynamic programming approach.

Economic theory·2023
Same journal

Stochastic disease spreading and containment policies under state-dependent probabilities.

Economic theory·2023
Same journal

Optimal group testing with heterogeneous risks.

Economic theory·2023
Same journal

Mobility decisions, economic dynamics and epidemic.

Economic theory·2023
Same journal

Optimal vaccination in a SIRS epidemic model.

Economic theory·2022
Same journal

Modelling optimal lockdowns with waning immunity.

Economic theory·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Dynamically consistent objective and subjective rationality.

Lorenzo Bastianello1, José Heleno Faro2, Ana Santos2

  • 1Université Paris 2 Panthéon-Assas, LEMMA, 4 rue Blaise Desgoffe, 75006 Paris, France.

Economic Theory
|June 7, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study addresses decision-making under uncertainty, proposing a method to ensure policy choices remain consistent over time. It introduces a novel approach to reassessing expert beliefs, preventing dynamic inconsistencies and avoiding regret.

Keywords:
Ambiguity AversionDynamic ConsistencyFull Bayesian UpdatingObjective RationalityRectangularitySubjective Rationality

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

811

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

811

Area of Science:

  • Decision Theory
  • Climate Science
  • Policy Analysis

Background:

  • Experts advise decision-makers on policy choices (f vs. g).
  • Current decision rules (unanimity, precautionary principle) can create time inconsistencies.
  • Uncertainty resolution over time can exacerbate these inconsistencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a method for dynamically consistent policy choices.
  • To address time inconsistencies arising from expert belief updates.
  • To provide a prescriptive approach for aggregating expert opinions.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzing decision rules involving unanimity and the precautionary principle.
  • Investigating time inconsistencies with partial uncertainty resolution.
  • Proposing a belief reassessment strategy based on 'rectangularity'.

Main Results:

  • The proposed belief reassessment method ensures dynamic consistency.
  • Achieving the smallest 'rectangular set' containing original beliefs is key.
  • This approach offers a novel behavioral characterization of rectangularity.

Conclusions:

  • Coherent reassessment of expert beliefs prevents sure regret.
  • The method provides a prescriptive way to aggregate opinions under uncertainty.
  • Ensures policy choices remain consistent despite evolving information.