Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction: a comparison of three methods.

A D Hains, I Al-Khawaja, D A Hinge

    British Heart Journal
    |March 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary

    Different computer programs yield varying left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) results. The semiautomatic method provides more consistent LVEF values, but results are not interchangeable between methods.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Theoretical analysis of thermomechanical response for biological skin tissues.

    Scientific reports·2026
    Same author

    Comparative thermoelastic analysis of semiconductors with an external heat source under three theories.

    Scientific reports·2025
    Same author

    Failure of diltiazem to prevent 1:1 conduction of atrial flutter: a case report.

    Journal of medical case reports·2023
    Same author

    Vomiting, electrolyte disturbance, and medications; the perfect storm for acquired long QT syndrome and cardiac arrest: a case report.

    Journal of medical case reports·2022
    Same author

    Aspergillosis following bronchial artery embolization.

    QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2020
    Same author

    Observational study comparing pharmacoinvasive strategy with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction to a tertiary care centre in India.

    Journal of postgraduate medicine·2017

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiology
    • Medical Imaging
    • Nuclear Medicine

    Background:

    • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a key indicator of cardiac function.
    • Accurate LVEF calculation is crucial for diagnosing and managing heart failure.
    • Multiple computational methods exist for LVEF determination, potentially leading to variability.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare LVEF calculations using semiautomatic, manual, and regional computer methods.
    • To assess the impact of different LVEF calculation methods on normal and heart failure patient populations.
    • To highlight the importance of method-specific reference ranges for LVEF.

    Main Methods:

    • Equilibrium multiple gated radionuclide ventriculography (MUGA) scans were performed.
    • LVEF was calculated using three distinct software programs: semiautomatic, manual, and regional.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Data were analyzed from 24 healthy male subjects and 20 male patients with heart failure.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences in LVEF values were observed between all three methods in both normal subjects and heart failure patients.
    • The semiautomatic method yielded higher and more consistent LVEF values compared to manual and regional methods.
    • Applying a normal LVEF range (≥50%) from the semiautomatic method to the regional method incorrectly classified 38% of normal subjects as having abnormal function.

    Conclusions:

    • The method used for time-activity curve generation significantly impacts LVEF calculation.
    • Clinicians must be aware of the variability in LVEF results based on the chosen computational method.
    • Each medical center should establish its own LVEF reference ranges and reproducibility metrics for the specific method employed.