ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study...

Area of Science:

• Biomedical Research Methodology
• Clinical Practice Guidelines
• Evidence Synthesis

Background:

• Structured consensus methods like Delphi are vital for clinical decision-making in areas with limited evidence.
• Inconsistent reporting of consensus methodology (e.g., panel selection, consensus definition) undermines research confidence and reproducibility.
• A need exists for standardized reporting to ensure transparency and consistency in consensus research.

Purpose of the Study:

• To systematically develop a reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedical research.
• To enhance the completeness, transparency, and consistency of reporting consensus techniques.
• To support the reliable application of expert knowledge in clinical decision-making.

Main Methods:

• The ACCURATE COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) project follows EQUATOR Network guidance.
• A five-stage process including a multidisciplinary steering committee, systematic literature review, and Delphi methodology.
• Finalization of the guideline and an Explanation and Elaboration document through a consensus meeting.

Main Results:

• Identification of evidence on reporting quality for consensus methodology.
• Development of a consensus checklist through iterative Delphi rounds.
• Creation of a comprehensive reporting guideline and supporting documentation.

Conclusions:

• The ACCORD guideline will establish minimum reporting items for consensus methods.
• It will cover a spectrum of consensus approaches, from informal to highly structured.
• Implementation of this guideline will improve the quality and trustworthiness of consensus-based research.