Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Encapsulated Cell Technology for the Delivery of Biologics to the Mouse Eye
Published on: March 30, 2020
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: systematic review and
Camila Q Felipe1, Ana Luiza Biancardi2, Vinicius T Civile3
1Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Institute of Medical Care for Civil Servants in the State of São Paulo (IAMSPE), São Paulo, Brazil.
Background:
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are widely used for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSCR), but their effectiveness remains unclear. This research was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this drugs for cCSCR.
Methods:
This is a review of randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing MRAs to placebo in adults with cCSCR, using the effects of MRAs on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and adverse events as primary outcomes and the effects of MRAs on anatomical parameters as secondary outcomes: central subfield thickness (CST), subretinal fluid height (SFH) and central choroidal thickness (CCT). Our all-language online search included Medline (via PubMed), Central, Embase, Lilacs, Ibecs, and RCT registers platforms, as late as May 2021. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (version 2) to assess the methodological quality of each study and synthesized the results in meta-analyses using a random-effects model.
Results:
The search identified 302 records, five of which were eligible, totaling 225 cCSCR patients (aged 45-62 years; M/F ratio 3.1:1) treated for 1 to 12 months with spironolactone (50 mg/day) or eplerenone (50 mg/day) vs. placebo. Moderate-certainty evidence suggests MRAs result in little to no improvement in BCVA compared to placebo (SMD 0.22; 95% CI - 0.04 to 0.48; studies = 5; comparisons = 6; participants = 218; I2 = 0%). Very low-certainty evidence suggests that, when compared to placebo, MRAs have a very uncertain impact on adverse effects (no meta-analysis was performed), and CST (MD 18.1; 95% CI - 113.04 to 76.84; participants = 145; studies = 2; I2 = 68%). MRAs also result in little to no difference in SFH (SMD - 0.35; 95% CI - 0.95 to 0.26; studies = 5; comparisons = 6; participants = 221; I2 = 76%; moderate certainty) and CCT (MD - 21.23; 95% CI - 64.69 to 22.24; participants = 206; studies = 4; comparisons = 5; I2 = 85%; low certainty).
Conclusion:
MRAs have little to no effect on BCVA. Evidence for adverse events and CST is very uncertain. MRAs also have little to no effect on SFH and CCT. These findings should be considered when prescribing MRAs for cCSCR. This research was previous registration in the PROSPERO platform (CRD42020182601).
Insights
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) show minimal impact on vision and anatomical measures in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSCR). Evidence regarding adverse events and central subfield thickness remains uncertain, suggesting limited clinical benefit.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Retinal Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are frequently prescribed for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSCR).
- The clinical effectiveness of MRAs in managing cCSCR is not well-established.
- This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of MRAs for cCSCR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of MRAs on visual acuity and anatomical parameters in patients with cCSCR.
- To evaluate the safety profile of MRAs in this patient population.
- To provide evidence-based insights for the clinical use of MRAs in cCSCR management.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing MRAs to placebo in adult cCSCR patients.
- Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and adverse events.
- Secondary outcomes assessed central subfield thickness (CST), subretinal fluid height (SFH), and central choroidal thickness (CCT).
- Searches were conducted across multiple databases up to May 2021, with risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane tool (version 2).
Main Results:
- Five RCTs involving 225 patients were included, treated with spironolactone or eplerenone versus placebo.
- Moderate-certainty evidence indicates MRAs have little to no effect on BCVA (SMD 0.22; 95% CI -0.04 to 0.48).
- MRAs demonstrated little to no effect on SFH (SMD -0.35; 95% CI -0.95 to 0.26) and CCT (MD -21.23; 95% CI -64.69 to 22.24).
- Evidence regarding adverse events and CST was of very low certainty, with uncertain impact on CST (MD 18.1; 95% CI -113.04 to 76.84).
Conclusions:
- MRAs demonstrate minimal to no significant effect on visual acuity in patients with cCSCR.
- The impact of MRAs on anatomical parameters like SFH and CCT is also negligible.
- The evidence concerning adverse events and CST is highly uncertain, warranting caution in prescribing MRAs for cCSCR.
More Related Videos
05:14Author Spotlight: Overcoming Anti-VEGF Resistance Through Advanced Vascular Morphology Assessment in Choroidal Neovascularization
Published on: August 11, 2023
06:19Author Spotlight: A Novel Protocol for Intracameral Injections to Enhance Precision in Rodent Ophthalmology
Published on: May 31, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Therapeutic Uses
Glaucoma: Overview
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System