Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

11:17
Comparative Analysis of Human Growth Hormone in Serum Using SPRi, Nano-SPRi and ELISA Assays
Published on: January 7, 2016
16.6K
Differences in the Distribution of IGF-I Concentrations Between European and US Populations
Martin Bidlingmaier1, Andre Valcour2, Katharina Schilbach1
1Endocrine Laboratory, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Journal of the Endocrine Society
|June 8, 2022
Summary
Reference intervals (RIs) for Insulin-like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) vary between the US and Europe. Upper limits are significantly higher in the US, suggesting a need for adapted RIs for accurate diagnosis of GH-related diseases.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Biomarker Analysis
Background:
- Method-specific reference intervals (RIs) are crucial for interpreting Insulin-like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) levels in growth hormone (GH)-related diseases.
- Population-specific variations can impact the clinical utility of established RIs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare population-specific RIs for IGF-I derived from routine laboratory testing in the United States and Europe.
- To assess the applicability of RIs across different geographical regions and demographic groups.
Main Methods:
- Utilized uncensored routine IGF-I testing data from four accredited laboratories (US and Europe) over five years.
- Constructed RIs using the indirect statistical modified Hoffmann approach.
- Compared derived RIs with published data and between US regions with differing mean body mass indexes (BMIs).
Main Results:
- Lower limits (LLs) of RIs were comparable between US and European datasets and with published RIs.
- Upper limits (ULs) derived from US routine data were significantly higher than those from European data for both children and adults.
- IGF-I levels were higher in samples from a lower BMI region in the US compared to a higher BMI region, but differences were smaller than US-Europe comparisons.
Conclusions:
- The indirect Hoffmann approach yields comparable RIs to direct sampling in large datasets.
- Significant differences exist in IGF-I upper limits between the United States and Europe.
- Adapted RIs for the United States are recommended to ensure accurate clinical interpretation.

