Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

14:23
A Restriction Enzyme Based Cloning Method to Assess the In vitro Replication Capacity of HIV-1 Subtype C Gag-MJ4 Chimeric Viruses
Published on: August 31, 2014
15.7K
Research Participation Influences Willingness to Reduce Zoonotic Exposure in Uganda
Laura S P Bloomfield1,2, Christopher Tracey3, Edith Mbabazi4
1Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. laura.bloomfield@gmail.com.
Ecohealth
|June 8, 2022
Summary
A human-centered design intervention increased willingness to adopt protective behaviors against zoonotic diseases in Uganda. While willingness to protect against domestic animal exposure was sustained, actual practices did not significantly differ between groups.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Zoonotic Disease Epidemiology
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Zoonotic diseases pose a significant threat, yet data on community knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) for prevention are limited, especially in biodiversity-rich areas.
- Understanding human-animal interactions is crucial for mitigating the risk of spillover events in communities bordering wildlife habitats.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of a human-centered design (HCD) intervention on participants' willingness to engage in protective behaviors against zoonotic disease exposure.
- To compare changes in KAP related to domestic and wild animal zoonotic exposure between an intervention and a comparison group over time.
Main Methods:
- A modified grounded-theory framework was used to develop a Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) survey.
- The survey was administered at two time points (KAPT1 and KAPT2) to participants living near Kibale National Park, Uganda.
- A difference-in-difference approach compared an intervention group (post-HCD activity) with a comparison group to evaluate sustained behavioral changes.
Main Results:
- Initially, the intervention group showed higher willingness for protective behaviors against wild animal zoonotic exposure, while the comparison group had lower willingness for domestic animal exposure.
- The HCD intervention led to a significant sustained increase in willingness to adopt protective behaviors against domestic animal zoonotic exposure in the intervention group by KAPT2.
- No significant differences in actual practices to avoid zoonotic exposure from domestic or wild animals were observed between the intervention and comparison groups.
Conclusions:
- Human-centered design interventions can effectively enhance willingness to adopt protective behaviors against zoonotic diseases, particularly concerning domestic animals.
- Translating increased willingness into consistent protective practices remains a challenge, highlighting the need for further research into behavioral implementation strategies.
- Targeted interventions are essential for improving public health outcomes in communities at high risk of zoonotic disease transmission.
Keywords:
Kibale National ParkUgandacommunity-engaged researchemerging infectious diseaseshuman-centered designhuman–animal infections
