Comparison between the Brazilian and 3 international gestational weight gain charts
Dayana R Farias1, Thais R B Carrilho1, Kathleen M Rasmussen2
1Nutritional Epidemiology Observatory, Department of Social and Applied Nutrition, Institute of Nutrition Josué de Castro, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Background:
Little is known about the ability of the recently released Brazilian gestational weight gain (GWG) charts to predict the occurrence of adverse birth outcomes.
Objectives:
We compared the new Brazilian weight gain charts with 3 international charts and determined their ability to predict the occurrence of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) births in Brazilian women.
Methods:
A subsample of 6888 adult women (43,931 weight measurements) with singleton pregnancies from a nationwide, hospital-based cohort study conducted in 2011-2012 was analyzed. Selected percentiles from Brazilian GWG charts were compared with those from American, International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century study, and Lifecycle consortium charts. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC values for SGA and LGA births were estimated with 95% CIs using the classification of GWG below or above selected percentiles of each chart.
Results:
The weight gain corresponding to a given percentile varied among the charts, especially for women with pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity. The proportions of women with GWG classified below or above selected percentiles were closest to the expected values for all pre-pregnancy BMI categories in the Brazilian and Lifecycle charts. At the 10th percentile, the highest sensitivity for SGA births was observed for the American charts at midpregnancy (36.8%) and the highest specificity was observed using the Brazilian charts in the first trimester (93.4%). At the 90th percentile, the highest sensitivity for LGA births occurred in midpregnancy for the Lifecycle charts (26.8%) and the highest specificity occurred in the American charts using total GWG (97.1%). All the AUROCs were under 0.5 for SGA births and ranged from 0.55 (first trimester) to 0.62 (total GWG) for LGA births.
Conclusions:
The charts differ in GWG trajectories, especially for women with overweight and obesity. The 4 charts had low predictive ability of SGA and LGA births and should not be considered as isolated screening tools for those outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Normal Distribution
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Regression Toward the Mean
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility,...
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...


