Impact of Parallel Acquisition Technology on the Robustness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomic Features
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: December 18, 2016
Kui Hu1, Wenyou Deng1, Ning Li1
1From the Department of Radiology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hongshan District, Wuhan, Hubei Province.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of integrated parallel acquisition technology (iPAT) on the robustness of magnetic resonance imaging radiomic features.
Methods:
A phantom and 6 healthy volunteers were scanned on a clinical 3-T system using T1-weighted (S1), T1-weighted fluid-attenuated (S2), T2-weighted fluid-attenuated (S3), and T2-weighted (S4); 2 iPAT flavors (generalized autocalibration partially parallel acquisitions and modified sensitivity encoding [mSENSE]) and their different acceleration factors R. Radiomic features were extracted, and their robustness was assessed using coefficient of variation (CV), and differences between sequences and region of interest (ROI) were evaluated using the χ2 test.
Results:
One volunteer was excluded because of movement during imaging acquisition. Generalized autocalibration partially parallel acquisitions provided more radiomic features with excellent robustness than mSENSE. Radiomic features with excellent robustness, unaffected by iPAT across different sequences and ROIs, in 92 radiomic features for phantom and healthy volunteers are 6.5% and 2.2%. For phantom, difference in the robustness degree between 4 sequences/P-ROIs was significant according to χ2 test; S2 and S3 could provide more excellent robust radiomic features than S1 and S4, and P-ROI3 filled with the biggest polystyrene particles could provide the most radiomic features with excellent robustness than the other P-ROIs. For healthy volunteers, only the difference in the degree of robustness between the 4 V-ROIs was significant, and V-ROI3 in white matter region of the left frontal lobe, which was located at periphery in image, could provide the most robust radiomic features compared with other V-ROIs.
Conclusions:
Integrated parallel acquisition technology had a significant impact on the robustness of radiomic features. Generalized autocalibration partially parallel acquisitions delivered a more robust substrate for radiomic analyses than mSENSE.
More Related Videos
17:16Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring
Published on: December 9, 2010
08:19Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
Published on: May 17, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI