Minimally invasive treatment of pilonidal sinus disease in a paediatric population: comparison of two techniques

Sara Fernandes1, Carolina Soares-Aquino1, Inês Teixeira1

  • 1Department of Paediatric Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.

Abstract

Insights

Minimally invasive techniques (MIT) for pilonidal disease (PD) show promise. Sinusectomy (SE) demonstrated faster healing and fewer complications than pit-picking plus laser ablation (PPL), with similar recurrence rates.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric surgery
  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Pilonidal disease management

Background:

  • Pilonidal disease (PD) is a common, debilitating inflammatory condition impacting quality of life.
  • Minimally invasive techniques (MIT) offer potential advantages over traditional excision for PD treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and outcomes of two MIT for pediatric PD: sinusectomy (SE) and pit-picking plus laser ablation (PPL).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of pediatric PD cases treated with PPL or SE between August 2018 and August 2020.
  • Analysis of healing time, healing failure, recurrence rates, and complication rates.

Main Results:

  • Sinusectomy (SE) showed a significantly lower median healing time (20 days) compared to pit-picking plus laser ablation (PPL) (30 days).
  • PPL had a higher rate of early healing failure and a significantly higher overall complication rate.
  • Recurrence rates were similar between SE (16%) and PPL (17%).

Conclusions:

  • While both MIT are viable for pediatric PD, SE offers a better healing profile and lower complication rate.
  • No significant difference in recurrence rates was observed between SE and PPL.

Related Concept Videos