Ischemic time and patient outcomes after the 2018 UNOS donor heart allocation system change

Umar Siddiqi1, Seth Lirette2, Ryan Hoang1

  • 1Department of Surgery, Section of Cardiac Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Insights

Heart transplant survival remains stable after the 2018 allocation system change, despite increased travel distances and ischemic times. Limiting organ transport time is crucial for recipient survival.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplantation Medicine
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • The US heart donor allocation system was revised on October 18, 2018, leading to increased donor-recipient travel distances and ischemic times.
  • This study investigates the impact of the new allocation system on patient outcomes and the role of ischemic time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate patient survival outcomes following the 2018 heart allocation system change in the United States.
  • To analyze the differential effects of organ ischemic time on survival under both the old and new allocation systems.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry (UNOS) for 62,301 adult heart transplants from October 1, 1987, to March 1, 2021.
  • Compared 30-day and 1-year survival outcomes and ischemic times using adjusted logistic and Cox regression models.

Main Results:

  • Mean ischemic time increased slightly under the new system (3.43 hours vs. 3.03 hours).
  • No significant differences in overall survival were observed between the old and new systems in adjusted models.
  • Longer ischemic times showed a trend towards being more detrimental to long-term survival under the new system compared to the old, but this did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions:

  • Despite increased travel distances, heart transplant survival outcomes have not significantly changed under the new allocation system.
  • Organ ischemic time remains a critical factor influencing recipient survival and should be minimized.
  • Further research is warranted to fully understand the long-term impacts of travel distances and ischemic time within the current allocation framework.
Abstract