Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Longitudinal evidence that Event Related Potential measures of self-regulation do not predict everyday goal pursuit
Blair Saunders1, Marina Milyavskaya2, Michael Inzlicht3,4
1Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. b.z.saunders@dundee.ac.uk.
Abstract:
Self-regulation has been studied across levels of analysis; however, little attention has been paid to the extent to which self-report, neural, and behavioral indices predict goal pursuit in real-life. We use a mixed-method approach (N = 201) to triangulate evidence among established measures of different aspects of self-regulation to predict both the process of goal pursuit using experience sampling, as well as longer-term goal progress at 1, 3, and 6-month follow-ups. While self-reported trait self-control predicts goal attainment months later, we observe a null relationship between longitudinal goal attainment and ERPs associated with performance-monitoring and reactivity to positive/rewarding stimuli. Despite evidence that these ERPs are reliable and trait-like, and despite theorizing that suggests otherwise, our findings suggest that these ERPs are not meaningfully associated with everyday goal attainment. These findings challenge the ecological validity of brain measures thought to assess aspects of self-regulation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Regulation
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Motivational Bias
Introspection
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring

