Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.1K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.1K
Force Classification01:22

Force Classification

1.7K
Forces play a crucial role in the study of physics and engineering. They are essential in describing the motion, behavior, and equilibrium of objects in the physical world. Forces can be classified based on their origin, type, and direction of action.
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Embedded Vision Intelligence for the Safety of Smart Cities.

Journal of imaging·2022
Same author

An IoT Platform Towards the Enhancement of Poultry Production Chains.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

652

Benchmarking Object Detection Deep Learning Models in Embedded Devices.

David Cantero1, Iker Esnaola-Gonzalez1, Jose Miguel-Alonso2

  • 1TEKNIKER, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 20600 Eibar, Spain.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 10, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study benchmarks deep learning object detection models on embedded devices, evaluating performance across different quantization levels and AI co-processors. Results guide hardware selection for efficient robotic applications.

Keywords:
benchmarkingdeep learningembedded devicesobject detection

More Related Videos

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
05:41

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis

Published on: February 6, 2020

9.5K
Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

652
A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
05:41

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis

Published on: February 6, 2020

9.5K
Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics
  • Computer Vision
  • Embedded Systems

Background:

  • Deep learning (DL) models achieve high accuracy in object detection but demand significant computational resources.
  • Robotic platforms often use embedded devices with limited power, necessitating model optimization for deployment.
  • Accelerating DL applications on embedded devices requires leveraging specialized AI co-processors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark the performance of various deep learning object detection models on embedded devices.
  • To provide hardware selection guidelines for embedded AI applications.
  • To analyze the impact of model quantization and AI co-processor utilization on performance.

Main Methods:

  • Benchmarking DL object detection models across two selected embedded boards.
  • Evaluating five quantization levels, including CPU-based execution as baseline and AI co-processor acceleration.
  • Detailed explanation of the benchmarking procedure and data analysis.

Main Results:

  • Quantization and AI co-processor usage significantly improve DL model performance on embedded devices.
  • Performance gains vary depending on the model architecture and quantization strategy.
  • Hardware selection impacts the feasibility and efficiency of embedded object detection.

Conclusions:

  • Optimizing deep learning models through quantization is crucial for embedded robotic applications.
  • AI co-processors offer substantial performance benefits over general-purpose CPUs for DL tasks.
  • Successful implementation requires careful consideration of hardware capabilities and model constraints.