Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Projection from previous studies: a Bayesian and frequentist compromise.

B W Brown, J Herson, E N Atkinson

    Controlled Clinical Trials
    |March 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    An arrangement with small solid angle for measurement of beta rays.

    Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards·2010
    Same author

    ON INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTIONS.

    Association medical journal·2010
    Same author

    The clinical effectiveness of fluorescence and reflectance spectroscopy for the in vivo diagnosis of cervical neoplasia: an analysis by phase of trial design.

    Gynecologic oncology·2007
    Same author

    New tumor markers: CA125 and beyond.

    International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society·2005
    Same author

    A pilot study for a screening trial of cervical fluorescence spectroscopy.

    International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society·2004
    Same author

    The Child Abuse Potential Inventory and pregnancy outcome in expectant adolescent mothers.

    Child abuse & neglect·2002
    Same journal

    On the generation and ownership of alpha in medical studies.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    An analysis of the effect of funding source in randomized clinical trials of second generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Symptom recording in a randomised clinical trial: paper diaries vs. electronic or telephone data capture.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Analyzing bronchodilation with emphasis on disease type, age and sex.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Geographic variability in patient characteristics, treatment and outcome in an International Trial of Magnesium in acute myocardial infarction.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    See all related articles

    This study introduces Bayesian methods to predict comparative trial outcomes using prior study data. These methods enhance the probability of demonstrating experimental treatment superiority in future clinical trials.

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Clinical Trial Design
    • Statistical Inference

    Background:

    • Predicting future clinical trial outcomes is crucial for efficient research.
    • Existing methods often lack the ability to fully leverage prior study data for predictive power.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop and present novel statistical methods for predicting comparative trial outcomes.
    • To enhance the prediction of experimental treatment superiority using Bayesian inference from preliminary studies.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilizing results from a previous study to inform predictions for a new comparative trial.
    • Applying Bayesian methods to derive a posterior distribution of key parameters.
    • Generalizing methods for dichotomous outcomes to other two-sample (e.g., survival) and one-sample cases.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The developed methods provide a probability distribution for the superiority of an experimental regimen over a standard.
    • The approach quantifies the likelihood that a future study will confirm treatment superiority.
    • The methods are adaptable for various statistical scenarios, including superiority to historical controls.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed Bayesian framework offers a robust approach to predicting clinical trial success.
    • Leveraging prior data significantly improves the probabilistic assessment of experimental treatment efficacy.
    • These methods facilitate more informed decision-making in clinical trial design and interpretation.