Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
Published on: June 28, 2018
Distinguishing "Through-Space" from "Through-Bonds" Contribution in Indirect Nuclear Spin-Spin Coupling: General
Olga L Malkina1, Jean-Cyrille Hierso2,3, Vladimir G Malkin1
1Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, Bratislava 84 536, Slovakia.
Abstract:
We present herein two complementary theoretical approaches for analyzing the transmission pathways of indirect nuclear spin-spin couplings in high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance. This phenomenon is notably conceptually poorly understood in complex experimental situations in which both nonbonded ["through-space" (TS)] and more "classical" bonding ("through-bond") spin-spin coupling pathways are potentially involved. The computational approaches we propose allow the visualization and discussion of individual transmission pathways and estimation of their relative weight from numerical contributions to the spin-spin coupling constant J-value. The first approach is based on the analysis of contributions limited to occupied molecular orbitals [focused on occupied molecular orbitals (FOMO)]. The second approach encompasses the consideration of both occupied and vacant orbitals [global molecular orbital contributions (GMOC)], and, besides the contributions from individual pathways, also considers their cross contributions. Both approaches are applicable to large systems with complex interactions of nuclear magnetic moments. Herein, we have first applied the FOMO and GMOC computational approaches to simple diphosphine models and then extended the analysis to JPP and JPSe experimentally measured in a constrained selenated (diphosphino)naphthalene compound. The new computational tools contributed evidence for the importance of the single lone pair not only from phosphorus but also from selenium in TS spin-spin transmission. It evidenced and modeled for the first time the existence of spin-spin transmission pathways mixing classical covalent bonding parts with a lone pair overlap of proximate heteroatoms (P and Se).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...

