Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Documenting Opportunity for Systematic Identification and Mitigation of Risk for Child Maltreatment
Mini Tandon1, Melissa Jonson-Reid2, John N Constantino1
1Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Insights
This study identifies high-risk newborns for child maltreatment (CM) using birth records. Integrating this screening into obstetrics can help connect at-risk families with interventions to prevent CM.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Obstetrics
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Child maltreatment (CM) affects 12% of U.S. children, with significant psychiatric sequelae.
- Birth record data identifies newborns at substantially elevated risk for CM.
- Existing risk factors include low birth weight, multiple siblings, unmarried mothers, Medicaid enrollment, and smoking during pregnancy.
Discussion:
- This research piloted birth record screening in an urban obstetrics service to validate epidemiological findings.
- The study assessed the feasibility of engaging high-risk families in supportive interventions.
- This approach aims to proactively mitigate CM risk within healthcare systems.
Key Insights:
- Newborns with three or more birth record risk factors represented 15% of a cohort but over half of those experiencing substantiated CM by age five.
- Prospective implementation in obstetrics confirmed the association between birth record risk factors and CM.
- Early identification via birth records enables targeted support for vulnerable families.
Outlook:
- Systematic integration of birth record screening into obstetrical and newborn care is recommended.
- This proactive strategy can reduce the incidence of child maltreatment and its long-term consequences.
- Further research should focus on optimizing intervention delivery within healthcare settings.
Abstract:
This is a communication of preliminary data as a matter of priority in relation to Clinical Trials protocol ID 2018110118; NCT04438161. This protocol represents, to our knowledge, a first-ever attempt to convert an epidemiologic discovery on risk for child maltreatment (CM) into a readily deployable modification of obstetrical practice designed to offset risk for CM and its psychiatric sequelae. Before1 and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 pandemic),2,3 CM has incurred a burden of epidemic proportions to U.S. children, with confirmed incidents occurring on the order of 12% of the population. Wu et al.4 and Putnam-Hornstein and Needell5 previously established that profiles of risk ascertained exclusively from birth records identified specific groups of newborns at highly elevated risk for official-report CM. For example, infants with the joint characteristics of low birth weight, more than 2 siblings, and maternal characteristics of being unmarried, on Medicaid, and smoking during pregnancy (ascertained separately) were found to have a 7-fold risk for maltreatment compared with the population average.4 Putnam-Hornstein and Needell showed that newborns with 3 or more risk factors ascertained from birth records (including any of the above, delayed prenatal care, less than high school maternal education, and maternal age less than 24 years) comprised 15% of an epidemiologic birth cohort but accounted for more than half of all the children in the cohort who experienced substantiated official-report maltreatment by the age of 5 years. This study explored whether prospective implementation of birth records screening in an urban obstetrical service recapitulated the association with CM observed in an epidemiologic context and whether families in higher echelons of risk (ascertained in this manner through birth records) could be prospectively engaged in supportive interventions of demonstrated effect in reducing the occurrence of CM. This work follows on promising efforts elsewhere to use birth records information to prioritize support services for young families,6 though such innovations have yet to be systematically incorporated into obstetrical or newborn medical services of U.S. health systems.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...