Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.5K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.5K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

223
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
223
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.9K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.7K
Subliminal Perception01:15

Subliminal Perception

352
Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...
352

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Picturing the past: the role of photo cue visual perspective on positive autobiographical memory recall in dysphoria.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same author

Obsessive-compulsive tendencies predict reduced access to affective reactions to auditory stimuli.

Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry·2025
Same author

He sees the forest, I see the trees: Narrative perspective shifts how abstractly people construe a text.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025
Same author

Choosing to avoid: The evaluative impact of autonomous selection of approach and avoidance behaviors.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

How people (fail to) control the influence of affective stimuli on attitudes.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024
Same author

Navigating the Social Environment: Linking Motivations, Impressions, and Behaviors Via a Sampling Approach to Trustworthiness.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

799

It's good and it's bad: Sampling processes can generate decision-framing effects.

Zachary Adolph Niese1, Mandy Hütter1

  • 1Department of Psychology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|June 13, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Decision framing effects, which alter choices based on gains versus losses, may stem from how people sample information, not just motivational biases. Biased information frequency influences decision accuracy depending on the framing and option success rates.

More Related Videos

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience
10:56

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

Published on: April 13, 2019

7.3K
Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation
07:12

Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation

Published on: August 26, 2016

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

799
An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience
10:56

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

Published on: April 13, 2019

7.3K
Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation
07:12

Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation

Published on: August 26, 2016

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Decision framing, where choices are presented as gains or losses, significantly impacts decisions, often reversing them.
  • This effect is traditionally attributed to motivational biases, particularly a stronger reaction to negative information.
  • Emerging research suggests biases in information sampling may also drive these framing effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how biases in the frequency of information about decision options influence decision-framing effects through a sampling process.
  • To test the hypothesis that gain versus loss framing affects memory probing for positive or negative information.
  • To determine if information sampling biases, rather than motivational biases, underlie decision-framing effects.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted to examine the role of information frequency biases in decision-framing effects.
  • Participants' memory retrieval for positive and negative information was assessed based on decision framing (gain vs. loss).
  • Decision accuracy was evaluated in relation to the frequency and success proportion of information for each option.

Main Results:

  • Decision accuracy was higher with gain framing when high-frequency options had a greater success proportion.
  • Conversely, accuracy decreased with gain framing when high-frequency options had a lower success proportion.
  • The results indicate that the frequency of available information significantly interacts with framing to affect decision outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Decision-framing effects may not solely indicate motivational biases but can arise from information sampling processes.
  • Biases in the frequency of information sampled can create apparent decision biases.
  • Understanding information sampling is crucial for explaining framing effects in decision-making.